Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy using the KangDuo Surgical Robot-01 Sys-tem versus the da Vinci System: a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial.
Zhang, Zhongyuan; Li, Zhenyu; Xu, Weifeng; Wang, Xuan; Zhu, Shengcai; Dong, Jie; Tian, Xiaojun; Zuo, Wei; Tang, Qi; Li, Zhihua; Yang, Kunlin; Xue, Xiaoqiang; Li, Yingjie; Zhang, Hongxian; Zhang, Qiming; Chen, Silu; Jin, Zhaoheng; Li, Xuesong; Ji, Zhigang; Ma, Lulin; Liu, Ming.
Affiliation
  • Zhang Z; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
  • Li Z; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
  • Xu W; Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Wang X; Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Zhu S; Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Dong J; Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Tian X; Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zuo W; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
  • Tang Q; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
  • Li Z; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
  • Yang K; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
  • Xue X; Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Li Y; Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang H; Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang Q; Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Chen S; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
  • Jin Z; Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Li X; Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing, China.
  • Ji Z; Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Ma L; Department of Urology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Liu M; Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Int Braz J Urol ; 502024 Aug 12.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133792
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

We aim to compare the safety and effectiveness of the KangDuo (KD)-Surgical Robot-01 (KD-SR-01) system and the da Vinci (DV) system for robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RARNU). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2022 and September 2023. Group 1 included 29 patients undergoing KD-RARNU. Group 2 included 29 patients undergoing DV-RARNU. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics, perioperative data, and follow-up outcomes were collected prospectively and compared between the two groups.

RESULTS:

There were no significant differences in patient baseline demographic and preoperative characteristics between the two groups. The success rates in both groups were 100% without conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery or positive surgical margins. No significant difference was observed in docking time [242 (120-951) s vs 253 (62-498) s, P = 0.780], console time [137 (55-290) min vs 105 (62-220) min, P = 0.114], operative time [207 (121-460) min vs 185 (96-305) min, P = 0.091], EBL [50 (10-600) mL vs 50 (10-700) mL, P = 0.507], National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index scores, and postoperative serum creatinine levels between the two groups. None of the patients showed evidence of distant metastasis, local recurrence, or equipment-related adverse events during the four-week follow-up. One (3.4%) patient in Group 2 experienced postoperative enterovaginal and enterovesical fistulas (Clavien-Dindo grade III).

CONCLUSIONS:

The KD-SR-01 system is safe and effective for RARNU compared to the DV Si or Xi system. Further randomized controlled studies with larger sample sizes and longer durations are required.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Int Braz J Urol Sujet du journal: UROLOGIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: Int Braz J Urol Sujet du journal: UROLOGIA Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Chine