Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of holmium-166 SPECT/CT quantification over a large range of activities.
Westlund Gotby, Lovisa E L; Lobeek, Daphne; Roosen, Joey; de Bakker, Maarten; Konijnenberg, Mark W; Nijsen, J Frank W.
Affiliation
  • Westlund Gotby LEL; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Lovisa.WestlundGotby@radboudumc.nl.
  • Lobeek D; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Roosen J; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • de Bakker M; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Konijnenberg MW; Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Nijsen JFW; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
EJNMMI Phys ; 11(1): 78, 2024 Sep 26.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39325204
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Quantitative imaging is a crucial step for dosimetry in radionuclide therapies. Traditionally, SPECT/CT imaging is quantified based on scanner-specific conversion factors or self-calibration, but recently absolute quantification methods have been introduced in commercial SPECT reconstruction software (Broad Quantification, Siemens Healthineers). In this phantom study we investigate the accuracy of three quantification methods for holmium-166 SPECT/CT imaging, and provide recommendations for clinical dosimetry.

METHODS:

One cylindrical phantom, filled with a homogeneous holmium-166-chloride activity concentration solution, was imaged at one time point to determine a scanner-specific conversion factor, and to characterize the spatial dependency of the activity concentration recovery. One Jaszczak phantom with six fillable spheres, 101 sphere-to-background ratio, was imaged over a large range of holmium-166 activities (61-3130 MBq). The images were reconstructed with either an ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM, Flash3D-reconstruction; scanner-specific quantification or self-calibration quantification) or an ordered subset conjugate gradient (OSCG, xSPECT-reconstruction; Broad Quantification) algorithm. These three quantification methods were compared for the data of the Jaszczak phantom and evaluated based on whole phantom recovered activity, activity concentration recovery coefficients (ACRC), and recovery curves.

RESULTS:

The activity recovery in the Jaszczak phantom was 28-115% for the scanner-specific, and 57-97% for the Broad Quantification quantification methods, respectively. The self-calibration-based activity recovery is inherently always 100%. The ACRC for the largest sphere (Ø60 mm, ~ 113 mL) ranged over (depending on the activity level) 0.22-0.89, 0.76-0.86, 0.39-0.72 for scanner-specific, self-calibration and Broad Quantification, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Of the three investigated quantification methods, the self-calibration technique produces quantitative SPECT images with the highest accuracy in the investigated holmium-166 activity range.
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: EJNMMI Phys Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Pays-Bas Pays de publication: Allemagne

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Langue: En Journal: EJNMMI Phys Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Pays-Bas Pays de publication: Allemagne