Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dobutamine stress echocardiography after positive CCTA: diagnostic performance using fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio as reference standards.
Tjellaug Bråten, Anders; Holte, Espen; Wiseth, Rune; Aakhus, Svend.
Affiliation
  • Tjellaug Bråten A; Clinic of Cardiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway anders.tjellaug.braten@stolav.no.
  • Holte E; Clinic of Cardiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Wiseth R; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Aakhus S; Clinic of Cardiology, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Open Heart ; 11(2)2024 Sep 30.
Article de En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39349050
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) in symptomatic patients with a low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) and a positive coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

METHODS:

We prospectively enrolled 104 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography for symptoms of stable CAD and a CCTA indicative of obstructive CAD. The diagnostic performance of DSE was evaluated against two intracoronary pressure indices (a) fractional flow reserve (FFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.80 and (b) instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) with a cut-off of ≤0.89, indicating haemodynamically significant stenoses.

RESULTS:

Of 102 patients, 46 (45%) had at least one significant lesion as defined by FFR, as did 37 (36%) as defined by iFR. DSE showed positive results in 33% (34/102) of cases. The discriminative power of DSE for detecting significant CAD was moderate, with areas under the curve of 0.63 (p=0.024) compared with FFR and 0.64 (p=0.025) compared with iFR. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of DSE were, respectively, 61%, 43%, and 75% against FFR, and 64%, 46% and 74% against iFR. The diagnostic accuracy of DSE did not differ significantly between FFR and iFR as a reference (p=0.549).

CONCLUSION:

In patients with positive CCTA, DSE has a moderate ability to identify haemodynamically significant CAD, with low sensitivity and moderate specificity. When assessed against FFR and iFR criteria, its additive diagnostic value is limited in patients with low to intermediate pretest probability of obstructive CAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03045601.
Sujet(s)
Mots clés

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Maladie des artères coronaires / Valeur prédictive des tests / Coronarographie / Échocardiographie de stress / Fraction du flux de réserve coronaire / Angiographie par tomodensitométrie Limites: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Open Heart Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Norvège Pays de publication: Royaume-Uni

Texte intégral: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Base de données: MEDLINE Sujet principal: Maladie des artères coronaires / Valeur prédictive des tests / Coronarographie / Échocardiographie de stress / Fraction du flux de réserve coronaire / Angiographie par tomodensitométrie Limites: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Langue: En Journal: Open Heart Année: 2024 Type de document: Article Pays d'affiliation: Norvège Pays de publication: Royaume-Uni