Critical aspects of immunoradiometric thyroglobulin assays.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Thyroglobulin (Tg) evaluation is currently used in the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), but the measurement methods are flawed by analytical inaccuracy. In this paper we describe the results of a comparison between seven different immunoradiometric assays (IRMAs) for Tg determination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Tg was measured in 50 patients with DTC by means of the following commercially available IRMA kits: HTGK-2 (DiaSorin), Tg IRMA (Schering-CIS bio international), ELSA-hTG (Schering-CIS bio international), Tg IRMA C.T. (ICN Pharmaceuticals), SELco Tg (Medipan Diagnostica), Tg Bridge IRMA (Adaltis) and IRMA-mat Tg (BYK-Sangtec Diagnostica). The distribution of the Tg values measured by the different IRMAs was compared and a correlation analysis was performed. RESULTS: The Tg values were widely dispersed and the classification of patients according to Tg concentrations of clinical relevance varied depending on the IRMA used. CONCLUSION: Despite efforts to develop standardized Tg assays, the measurement of this biomarker is still affected by a considerable degree of analytical inaccuracy. Tg values vary widely between assays and the classification of patients according to Tg values with clinical relevance is still dependent on the assay used.