Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of transversus abdominis plane block vs spinal morphine for pain relief after Caesarean section.
McMorrow, R C N; Ni Mhuircheartaigh, R J; Ahmed, K A; Aslani, A; Ng, S-C; Conrick-Martin, I; Dowling, J J; Gaffney, A; Loughrey, J P R; McCaul, C L.
Affiliation
  • McMorrow RC; Department of Anesthesia, Rotunda Hospital, Parnell Square, Dublin 1, Ireland.
Br J Anaesth ; 106(5): 706-12, 2011 May.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21498494
BACKGROUND: Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an alternative to spinal morphine for analgesia after Caesarean section but there are few data on its comparative efficacy. We compared the analgesic efficacy of the TAP block with and without spinal morphine after Caesarean section in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Eighty patients were randomized to one of four groups to receive (in addition to spinal anaesthesia) either spinal morphine 100 µg (S(M)) or saline (S(S)) and a postoperative bilateral TAP block with either bupivacaine (T(LA)) 2 mg kg(-1) or saline (T(S)). RESULTS: Pain on movement and early morphine consumption were lowest in groups receiving spinal morphine and was not improved by TAP block. The rank order of median pain scores on movement at 6 h was: S(M)T(LA) (20 mm)
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain, Postoperative / Cesarean Section / Analgesia, Obstetrical / Analgesics, Opioid / Morphine / Nerve Block Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Br J Anaesth Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pain, Postoperative / Cesarean Section / Analgesia, Obstetrical / Analgesics, Opioid / Morphine / Nerve Block Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: Br J Anaesth Year: 2011 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: