Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Single-stage versus 2-stage sleeve gastrectomy as a conversion after failed adjustable gastric banding: 30-day outcomes.
Obeid, Nabeel R; Schwack, Bradley F; Kurian, Marina S; Ren-Fielding, Christine J; Fielding, George A.
Affiliation
  • Obeid NR; Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, 530 First Ave., Suite 10S, New York, NY, 10016, USA, nabeel.obeid@nyumc.org.
Surg Endosc ; 28(11): 3186-92, 2014 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24902818
BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is being performed as a conversion after adjustable gastric banding (AGB), often in a single stage. However, some argue that it should be performed in 2 stages to improve safety. Few studies compare complications between 1-stage and 2-stage procedures. Our aim is to compare the 30-day complication rates among these two groups. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients converted from AGB to SG between 8/2008 and 10/2013 and compared patients undergoing 1-stage and 2-stage techniques. Primary outcome was overall 30-day adverse event rate (postoperative complication, readmission, or reoperation). Secondary outcomes included operating room (OR) time, length of stay (LOS), leak, infection, and bleeding rates, as well as mortality. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients underwent SG after band removal; three were excluded due to short follow-up, leaving 60 1-stage and 20 2-stage. Mean time from band removal to SG for 2-stage was 438 days. Demographics, intraoperative technique (bougie size, staple reinforcement, oversewing staple line, and leak test), and mean follow-up were not statistically different. Mean OR time (132.1 min 1-stage vs. 127.8 min 2-stage, p = 0.702) and LOS (3.1 vs. 2.4 days, p = 0.676) were similar. Overall 30-day adverse event rate was 12 % for 1-stage versus 15 % for 2-stage procedures (p = 0.705). Differences in 30-day readmission (8 vs. 5 %) and reoperation (5 vs. 0 %) were not statistically significant (p = 0.999 and 0.569, respectively). Leak (3 vs. 0 %, p = 0.999), abscess (2 vs. 5 %, p = 0.440), and bleeding rates (2 vs. 0 %, p = 0.999) were not different. There were no deaths. CONCLUSIONS: SG performed as a conversion after AGB is safe and feasible. Our findings indicate no statistical difference in 30-day outcomes when performed in 1 or 2 stages. Future studies with larger sample sizes are necessary to further investigate these differences.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Obesity, Morbid / Gastroplasty / Laparoscopy / Gastrectomy Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Obesity, Morbid / Gastroplasty / Laparoscopy / Gastrectomy Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Surg Endosc Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2014 Document type: Article Country of publication: