Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between Conventional and Minimally Invasive Dynamic Hip Screws for Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur.
Mahmood, A; Kalra, M; Patralekh, M K.
Affiliation
  • Mahmood A; Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Milton Keynes Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire, MK6 5LD, UK ; Department of Orthopaedics, Sohar Hospital, Sohar 321, Oman.
  • Kalra M; Department of Orthopaedics, Sohar Hospital, Sohar 321, Oman ; Department of Orthopaedics, Dr. RML Hospital and Lady Hardinge Medical College and Associated Hospitals, Delhi 110001, India.
  • Patralekh MK; Central Health Services, C1/160-161, Second Floor, Sector 16, Rohini, Delhi 110089, India.
ISRN Orthop ; 2013: 484289, 2013.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24959361
ABSTRACT
Background. Intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur are one of the most common fractures encountered, and dynamic hip screw with a side plate is the standard treatment. We compared a minimally invasive surgical technique with the conventional surgical technique used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with the dynamic hip screw (DHS) device. Methods. Thirty patients with such fractures were treated with the conventional open technique and 30 with a new minimally invasive technique. Patients in both groups were followed up for 1 year. Results. There was less blood loss, minimal soft tissue destruction, shorter hospital stay, and early mobilization with the minimally invasive technique. Conclusion. The present study finds minimally invasive technique superior to conventional (open) DHS.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: ISRN Orthop Year: 2013 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: ISRN Orthop Year: 2013 Document type: Article Affiliation country: