Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of donor-recipient age matching in living donor liver transplantation.
Han, J H; Kim, D G; Na, G H; Kim, E Y; Lee, S H; Hong, T H; You, Y K.
Affiliation
  • Han JH; Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim DG; Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: kimdg@catholic.ac.kr.
  • Na GH; Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim EY; Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee SH; Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Hong TH; Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • You YK; Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
Transplant Proc ; 47(3): 718-22, 2015 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25891717
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The use of a marginal donor, such as an elderly donor, in liver transplantation has been increasing in response to organ disparity; however, major risk factors for graft and patient survivals have been reported.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 559 patients who underwent living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at our hospital from May 2003 to June 2013. Elderly donors were defined as those >50 years old, and elderly recipients were defined as those >60 years old. We evaluated the differences in survival according to donor and recipient ages. Furthermore, we compared post-transplantation outcomes according to donor-recipient age matching.

RESULTS:

The overall 5-year survival rate of the recipients was significantly lower in the elderly donor group than in the younger donor group (84.6% vs 58.2%; P < .001). However, no significant difference in survival rate was observed according to recipient age (P = .908). The survival rate of elderly recipients who received a graft from an elderly donor was significantly lower than those of the other groups (P < .001-.037). The mortality rate was significantly different among the groups (P < .001), and among the causes of death, surgical complications were most frequent cause in the elderly donor group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS:

LDLT with the use of elderly donors >50 years of age could result in higher mortality rates than using younger donors. As such, elderly donor livers ideally should be matched with young recipients and attention concentrated on the surgical complications.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Liver Transplantation / Living Donors Type of study: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transplant Proc Year: 2015 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Liver Transplantation / Living Donors Type of study: Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Transplant Proc Year: 2015 Document type: Article