A post-market surveillance analysis of the safety of hydroxyapatite-derived products as bone graft extenders or substitutes for spine fusion.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is considered the gold standard for spine surgical procedures to achieve a successful fusion, because of its known osteoinductive and osteoconductive properties. Considering its autogenous origin, the use of ICBG has not been associated to an increase of intraoperative or postoperative complications directly related to the surgery. However, complications related to the harvesting procedure and to the donor site morbidity have been largely reported in the literature, favoring the development of a wide range of alternative products to be used as bone graft extenders or substitutes for spine fusion. The family of ceramic-based bone grafts has been widely used and studied during the last years for spine surgical procedures in order to reduce the need for iliac crest bone grafting and the consequent morbidity associated to the harvesting procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report here the results of a post-market surveillance analysis performed on four independent cohorts of patients (115 patients) to evaluate the safety of three different formulations of hydroxyapatite-derived products used as bone graft extenders/substitutes for lumbar arthrodesis. RESULTS: No intraoperative or post-operative complications related to the use of hydroxyapatite-derived products were detected, during medium and long follow up period (minimum 12 months-maximum 5 years). CONCLUSIONS: This post-market surveillance analysis evidenced the safety of ceramic products as bone graft extenders or substitutes for spine fusion. Moreover, the evidence of the safety of hydroxyapatite-derived products allows to perform clinical studies aimed at evaluating the fusion rates and the clinical outcomes of these materials as bone graft extenders/substitutes, in order to support their use as an alternative to ICBG for spine fusion.