Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The establishment of the Triple I (Hub), an intake, information and intervention hub.
Chow, Josephine; Waldon, Penny; Lubiana, Adele; Williams, Robin; Loy, Graeme; Lim, Kung; Larkin, Amanda; Kohler, Friedbert.
Affiliation
  • Chow J; a Clinical Innovation & Business Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District , Locked Bag 7103, BC 1871, Liverpool , NSW 2170 , Australia.
  • Waldon P; g School of nursing, University of Sydney , Sydney , Australia.
  • Lubiana A; h School of Health Science, University of Tasmania , Hobart , Australia.
  • Williams R; b Primary & Community Health, South Western Sydney Local Health District , Locked Bag 7103, BC 1871, Liverpool , NSW 2170 , Australia.
  • Loy G; c Aged Care & Rehabilitation South Western Sydney Local Health District , Locked Bag 7103, BC 1871, Liverpool , NSW 2170 , Australia.
  • Lim K; b Primary & Community Health, South Western Sydney Local Health District , Locked Bag 7103, BC 1871, Liverpool , NSW 2170 , Australia.
  • Larkin A; d Operations, South Western Sydney Local Health District , Locked Bag 7103, BC 1871, Liverpool , NSW 2170 , Australia.
  • Kohler F; e Nursing & Midwifery Service, South Western Sydney Local Health District , Locked Bag 7103, BC 1871, Liverpool , NSW 2170 , Australia.
Contemp Nurse ; 50(2-3): 227-37, 2015.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26552597
OBJECTIVE: An integrated intake, information and intervention service, Triple I (Hub) was evaluated against its goal to be streamlined, co-ordinated and patient focussed. The integrated service co-located six previously disparate services, often accessed by the same patients and healthcare professionals. The service was evaluated five months after implementation. METHODS: Review methods included satisfaction surveys and observations made by an external expert. RESULTS: Survey findings from 118 participants indicated positive perceptions of all aspects of the service provided by Triple I (Hub), with similar ratings provided by staff (n = 56) and clients (n = 62). The external expert reported that there was improved job satisfaction expressed by staff, and there was significant reduction in processing time of aged care referrals from 3 weeks to less than 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from mixed methods evaluation was used. Quantitative survey results only reported satisfaction by users, but observations provided supplementary indications for service development.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Referral and Consultation / Data Collection / Community Health Nursing / Information Dissemination / Geriatric Nursing Type of study: Evaluation_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Contemp Nurse Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Palliative Care / Referral and Consultation / Data Collection / Community Health Nursing / Information Dissemination / Geriatric Nursing Type of study: Evaluation_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Contemp Nurse Journal subject: ENFERMAGEM Year: 2015 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: