Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Getting "Unstuck": A Multi-Site Evaluation of the Efficacy of an Interdisciplinary Pain Intervention Program for Chronic Low Back Pain.
Clark, Timothy; Wakim, Jean Claude; Noe, Carl.
Affiliation
  • Clark T; Baylor Center for Pain Management, 3600 Gaston Ave, Wadley Tower, Suite 360, Dallas, TX 75246, USA. Timothy.Clark@BSWHealth.org.
  • Wakim JC; Baylor Center for Pain Management, 3600 Gaston Ave, Wadley Tower, Suite 360, Dallas, TX 75246, USA. Jean.Wakim@BSWHealth.org.
  • Noe C; Eugene McDermott Center for Pain Management-University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 1801 Inwood Avenue, Suite WA 7.5, Dallas, TX 75390, USA. Carl.Noe@utsouthwestern.edu.
Healthcare (Basel) ; 4(2)2016 Jun 14.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27417621
ABSTRACT
Chronic low back pain is one of the major health problems in the U.S., resulting in a large number of years of disability. To address the biopsychosocial nature of pain, interdisciplinary pain programs provide integrated interventions by an interdisciplinary team in a unified setting with unified goals. This study examined outcomes of an interdisciplinary program located at two sites with different staff, yet with a unified model of treatment and documentation. Efficacy at the combined sites was examined by comparing standard measures obtained upon admission to the program with measures at completion of a 3-4 week long program for 393 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Repeated measures included pain severity, pain interference, efficacy of self-management strategies, hours of activity, depression, ability to do ADLs, and physical endurance. All repeated measures differed at the p < 0.001 level, with large effect sizes (0.66-0.85). Eighty-two percent of graduates reported being "very much improved" or "much improved". A second analyses provided evidence that treatment effects were robust across sites with no differences (<0.001) found on five of seven selected outcome measures. A third analysis found that number of days of treatment was correlated on three of seven measures at the <0.01 level. However, the amount of variance explained by days of treatment was under 5% on even the most highly correlated measure. These finding are consistent with previous research and explore short-term effectiveness of treatment across treatment sites and with variable duration of treatment.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: Healthcare (Basel) Year: 2016 Document type: Article Affiliation country:
...