Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act on the Field of Ophthalmology.
Kinker, Brenton; Dobesh, Kaitlyn; Nassiri, Nariman; Juzych, Mark S; Wilson, M Roy.
Affiliation
  • Kinker B; Kresge Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Dobesh K; Kresge Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Nassiri N; Kresge Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Juzych MS; Kresge Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
  • Wilson MR; Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan. Electronic address: wilsonmroy1@gmail.com.
Am J Ophthalmol ; 179: 1-9, 2017 Jul.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28414044
PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) on the field of ophthalmology. DESIGN: A perspective on the effects of MACRA's Quality Payment Program after analysis of the proposed rule, final rule, and commentary submitted by relevant stakeholders. RESULTS: Physicians will need to use 1 of 2 payment structures: Merit-Based Incentive Payment Systems (MIPS) or Alternative Payment Models (APMs). APMs and MIPS will focus on bundling payments and reimbursing based on "fee-for-service-plus" models, which take into account clinical outcomes, coordination of care, clinical improvement, and electronic information exchange and security. APMs have substantial advantages, with eligible participants receiving a bonus and a higher rate of annual adjustment over the program's life. For most ophthalmology practices, MIPS may be more appropriate owing to its broader applicability and the current paucity of APMs for ophthalmologists. CONCLUSION: The Quality Payment Program is a substantial improvement over the negative adjustments under the repealed Substantial Growth Rate model. Ophthalmologists will likely use the MIPS system; however, its comparatively lower reimbursements, as well as its cost, quality, and other reporting measures, may prove problematic.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / Health Expenditures Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Ophthalmology / Health Expenditures Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Year: 2017 Document type: Article Country of publication: