Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-interference of Bovine-Human reassortant pentavalent rotavirus vaccine ROTASIIL® with the immunogenicity of infant vaccines in comparison with a licensed rotavirus vaccine.
Desai, Sajjad; Rathi, Niraj; Kawade, Anand; Venkatramanan, Padmasani; Kundu, Ritabrata; Lalwani, Sanjay K; Dubey, A P; Venkateswara Rao, J; Narayanappa, D; Ghildiyal, Radha; Gogtay, Nithya J; Venugopal, P; Palkar, Sonali; Munshi, Renuka; Bavdekar, Ashish; Juvekar, Sanjay; Ganguly, Nupur; Niyogi, Prabal; Uttam, Kheya Ghosh; Kondekar, Alpana; Kumbhar, Dipti; Mohanlal, Smilu; Agarwal, Mukesh C; Shetty, Parvan; Antony, Kalpana; Gunale, Bhagwat; Dharmadhikari, Abhijeet; Deshpande, Jagdish; Nalavade, Uma; Sharma, Deepa; Bansal, Anurag; Tang, Yuxiao; Flores, Jorge; Kulkarni, Prasad S.
Affiliation
  • Desai S; Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
  • Rathi N; PATH, India.
  • Kawade A; Vadu Rural Health Program KEM Hospital Research Centre Vadu, Pune, India.
  • Venkatramanan P; Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre, Chennai, India.
  • Kundu R; Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, India.
  • Lalwani SK; Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College & Hospital, Pune, India.
  • Dubey AP; Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India.
  • Venkateswara Rao J; Gandhi Medical College & Gandhi Hospital, Secunderabad, India.
  • Narayanappa D; JSS Medical College & Hospital, Mysore, India.
  • Ghildiyal R; T.N. Medical College & B.Y.L. Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Gogtay NJ; Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Venugopal P; Andhra Medical College, Visakhapatnam, India.
  • Palkar S; Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College & Hospital, Pune, India.
  • Munshi R; T.N. Medical College & B.Y.L. Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Bavdekar A; Vadu Rural Health Program KEM Hospital Research Centre Vadu, Pune, India.
  • Juvekar S; Vadu Rural Health Program KEM Hospital Research Centre Vadu, Pune, India.
  • Ganguly N; Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, India.
  • Niyogi P; Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, India.
  • Uttam KG; Institute of Child Health, Kolkata, India.
  • Kondekar A; T.N. Medical College & B.Y.L. Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Kumbhar D; T.N. Medical College & B.Y.L. Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Mohanlal S; T.N. Medical College & B.Y.L. Nair Charitable Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Agarwal MC; Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Shetty P; Seth GS Medical College & KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Antony K; PATH, India.
  • Gunale B; Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
  • Dharmadhikari A; Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India.
  • Deshpande J; Enterovirus Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
  • Nalavade U; Enterovirus Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
  • Sharma D; Enterovirus Research Centre, Mumbai, India.
  • Bansal A; Quest Diagnostics India Private Limited, Gurgaon, India.
  • Tang Y; PATH, USA.
  • Flores J; PATH, USA.
  • Kulkarni PS; Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd., Pune, India. Electronic address: drpsk@seruminstitute.com.
Vaccine ; 36(37): 5519-5523, 2018 09 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30104114
BACKGROUND: A newly developed bovine-human reassortant pentavalent vaccine (BRV-PV, ROTASIIL®) was tested for its potential effect on the immunogenicity of concomitantly administered EPI vaccines in infants in a randomized controlled study in India. METHODS: In this Phase III, multicenter, open label, randomized, controlled study, three doses of BRV-PV or two doses of Rotarix® and one dose of placebo were given to healthy infants at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age. Subjects also received three doses of DTwP-HepB-Hib (diphtheria, tetanus, whole-cell pertussis, hepatitis B, and haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate - pentavalent vaccine) and oral polio vaccine concomitantly at 6, 10, and 14 weeks of age and a single dose of inactivated polio vaccine at 14 weeks of age. Blood samples were collected four weeks after the final vaccination to assess immune responses to all the vaccines administered. For diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, Hib, polio type 1, and polio type 3 antibodies, non-interference was to be supported if the lower limit of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for the seroprotection rate difference for the BRV-PV group minus the Rotarix® group was >10.0%. For pertussis antibodies, non-interference was to be supported if the lower limit of the two-sided 90% CI for the ratio of geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) was >0.5. RESULTS: A total of 1500 infants were randomized to either BRV-PV (1125 infants) or Rotarix® (375 infants), of which 1341 completed the study as per the protocol. More than 97% of subjects achieved seroprotective antibody titres against diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, Hib, polio type 1, and polio type 3 in both groups. The difference in seroprotection rates between the BRV-PV group and the Rotarix® group for all these antibodies was less than 1%. The ratio of GMCs of anti-pertussis IgG concentrations for the BRV-PV group versus Rotarix® was 1.04 [90% CI: 0.90; 1.19]. CONCLUSION: BRV-PV does not interfere with the immunogenicity of concomitantly administered routine infants vaccines.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rotavirus Infections / Rotavirus Vaccines / Immunogenicity, Vaccine / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Animals / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: Vaccine Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rotavirus Infections / Rotavirus Vaccines / Immunogenicity, Vaccine / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Animals / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Language: En Journal: Vaccine Year: 2018 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: