Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A nationwide cohort study of resection rates and short-term outcomes in open and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.
Søreide, Kjetil; Olsen, Frank; Nymo, Linn S; Kleive, Dyre; Lassen, Kristoffer.
Affiliation
  • Søreide K; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway; Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, UK; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: ksoreide@mac.com.
  • Olsen F; Centre for Clinical Documentation and Evaluation (SKDE), Northern Norway Regional Health Authority, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Nymo LS; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
  • Kleive D; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  • Lassen K; Institute of Clinical Medicine, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
HPB (Oxford) ; 21(6): 669-678, 2019 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30391219
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Distal pancreatectomy (DP) is increasingly done by laparoscopy but data from routine practise are scarce. We describe practise in a national cohort.

METHODS:

Data from the Norwegian Patient Register of all patients undergoing DP from 2012 to 2016. National resection rates were analysed. Short-term outcomes include length of stay, reoperation, readmissions and 90-day mortality. Risk is reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (c.i.).

RESULTS:

Of 554 procedures, 327 (59%) were laparoscopic. Median age was 66 years (iqr 55-72) and 52% were women. Resection rates increased during the period for all DP (from 1.76 to 2.39 per 100.000/yr), and significantly for laparoscopic DP (adjusted R-square 0.858; P = 0.015). Elderly patients had more resection (r2 = 0.11; P = 0.019). Splenectomy (n = 427; 77%) was less likely with laparoscopy (laparoscopy 72% vs open 84%, respectively; OR 0.64, 95% c.i. 0.42-0.97; P = 0.035). Multivisceral resections occurred more often in open DP (5.3% vs 1.2% for laparoscopy, OR 4.51, 1.44-14.2; P = 0.008). Reoperation occurred in 34 (6%), readmission in 109 (20%), and mortality in 8 (1.4%). Hospital stay was shorter for laparoscopic DP.

CONCLUSION:

Use of DP increases in the population, particularly in the elderly, with use of laparoscopic access and an association with a reduced hospital stay.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatectomy / Pancreatic Neoplasms / Registries / Population Surveillance / Laparoscopy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: HPB (Oxford) Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pancreatectomy / Pancreatic Neoplasms / Registries / Population Surveillance / Laparoscopy Type of study: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: HPB (Oxford) Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2019 Document type: Article