Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characteristics of Local Delivery Agents for Treating Peri-Implantitis on Dental Implant Surfaces: A Preclinical Study.
Lee, Jong-Bin; Kweon, Helen Hye-In; Cho, Hyun-Jae; Kim, Chang-Sung; Kim, Young-Taek.
Affiliation
  • Lee JB; 1 Department of Periodontology, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kweon HH; 2 Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho HJ; 3 Department of Periodontology, Ilsan Hospital, National Health Insurance Service, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim CS; 4 Department of Preventive Dentistry and Public Oral Health, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YT; 2 Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Oral Implantol ; 45(2): 116-126, 2019 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30452331
Local delivery agents (LDAs) are widely used in peri-implantitis treatments. The aim of this study was to identify LDAs remaining on the dental implant surfaces and to analyze the components of these residues after applying various cleaning methods. Implants were prepared with a sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched surface. Four kinds of LDAs were applied on the implant surfaces: chlorhexidine gel (group 2), tetracycline solution (group 3), and 2 kinds of minocycline hydrochloride agents (groups 4 and 5). Group 1 received normal saline as a control. Two cleaning methods were applied for different durations as follows: (1) running distilled water for 10 seconds (subgroup A), 5 minutes (subgroup B), and 15 minutes (subgroup C); and (2) water spray of a dental-unit chair for 10 seconds (subgroup D) and 5 minutes (subgroup E). Scanning electron microscopy and energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy were used to analyze the surface morphology and residue components for all implants. The amount of LDA removed from the implant surfaces in groups 1, 2, 3, and 5 increased with the cleaning duration and pressure. However, Minocline remained coated on the implant surfaces in group 4 under all cleaning conditions. Minocline could not be cleaned off well by water due to its hydrophobicity. Therefore, directly using this agent on implant surfaces with peri-implantitis should be carefully considered. The presence of LDA residues without drug efficacies on implant surfaces might interfere with reosseointegration and act as a reservoir of microorganisms.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Implants / Chlorhexidine / Peri-Implantitis / Anti-Infective Agents, Local Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Oral Implantol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dental Implants / Chlorhexidine / Peri-Implantitis / Anti-Infective Agents, Local Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Oral Implantol Year: 2019 Document type: Article Country of publication: