Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Is the Evidence to Support a Correlate of Protection for Measles? A Systematic Review.
Bolotin, Shelly; Hughes, Stephanie L; Gul, Nazish; Khan, Sumaiya; Rota, Paul A; Severini, Alberto; Hahné, Susan; Tricco, Andrea; Moss, William J; Orenstein, Walter; Turner, Nikki; Durrheim, David; Heffernan, Jane M; Crowcroft, Natasha.
Affiliation
  • Bolotin S; Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hughes SL; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Gul N; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Khan S; Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Rota PA; Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Severini A; Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Hahné S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Tricco A; National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Moss WJ; Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Orenstein W; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
  • Turner N; Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Durrheim D; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Heffernan JM; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Crowcroft N; Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
J Infect Dis ; 221(10): 1576-1583, 2020 04 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31674648
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Many studies assume that the serologic correlate of protection from measles disease is 120 mIU/mL. We systematically reviewed the literature to examine the evidence supporting this correlate of protection.

METHODS:

We searched peer-reviewed and gray literature for articles reporting a measles correlate of protection. We excluded studies focusing on special populations, infants aged <9 months, and those using animal models or nonstandard vaccines or administration routes. We extracted and synthesized data from full-text articles that met inclusion criteria.

RESULTS:

We screened 14 778 articles and included 5 studies in our review. The studies reported either preexposure antibody concentrations of individuals along with a description of symptoms postexposure, or the proportion of measles cases that had preexposure antibody concentrations above a threshold of immunity specified by the authors. Some studies also described secondary antibody responses upon exposure. The variation in laboratory methods between studies made comparisons difficult. Some of the studies that assumed 120 mIU/mL as a correlate of protection identified symptomatic individuals with preexposure titers exceeding this threshold.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings underscore the scant data upon which the commonly used 120 mIU/mL measles threshold of protection is based, suggesting that further work is required to characterize the measles immunity threshold.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Measles Vaccine / Measles / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Infect Dis Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Measles Vaccine / Measles / Antibodies, Viral Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Infect Dis Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: