Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Indications, Surgical Complications, and Long-Term Outcomes in Pediatric Esophageal Reconstructions with Pedicled Jejunal Interposition Graft.
Koivusalo, Antti; Suominen, Janne; Salminen, Jukka; Pakarinen, Mikko.
Affiliation
  • Koivusalo A; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Suominen J; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Salminen J; Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
  • Pakarinen M; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Eur J Pediatr Surg ; 30(1): 111-116, 2020 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31893560
INTRODUCTION: Several surgical techniques are available for pediatric esophageal reconstruction. We started to use pedicled jejunum interposition graft (PJIG) because other techniques had significant long-term complications. In this retrospective study, the indications, surgical complications, and long-term outcomes were assessed in patients with PJIG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With ethical consent, we reviewed the hospital records of 14 patients (7 females) who from 2005 to 2019 underwent a total of 16 esophageal reconstructions with PJIG. RESULTS: Median age at PJIG was 1.6 (range: 0.2-15) years. Underlying conditions were esophageal atresia (EA) (n = 11) or native esophagus lost by trauma or infection (n = 3). Eight patients with EA underwent PJIG as primary reconstruction and three as a rescue operation after complications in primary repair. Significant surgical complications occurred in 43% of patients. Major reoperations in six (43%) patients included resection and reanastomosis of strictured proximal PJIG (n = 1) and redo PJIG after failure of the first operation (n = 2). Surgical mortality was nil. After a median follow-up of 6.5 (range: 0.7-14) years, 13 (93%) patients survived, and 1 died of congenital heart disease. PJIG failed in three (23%) survivors of whom two underwent graft removal because of life-threatening aspiration and one did not start oral feeds at all. Ten survivors (77%) have full enteral feeds. Respiratory function in the survivors is satisfactory. Two patients have moderate and three mild gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. CONCLUSION: PJIG was a functional option for a variety of conditions that required esophageal reconstruction. However, significant early and late complications required major surgical revisions.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Flaps / Plastic Surgery Procedures / Esophagus / Jejunum Type of study: Observational_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant / Newborn Language: En Journal: Eur J Pediatr Surg Journal subject: PEDIATRIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgical Flaps / Plastic Surgery Procedures / Esophagus / Jejunum Type of study: Observational_studies Aspects: Ethics Limits: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Humans / Infant / Newborn Language: En Journal: Eur J Pediatr Surg Journal subject: PEDIATRIA Year: 2020 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: