Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: is it still valid in the era of robotic endourology? Can it be more efficient?
Curr Opin Urol
; 30(2): 120-129, 2020 03.
Article
in En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-31990816
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of the article is to evaluate the actual role of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of urolithiasis based on the new developments of flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). RECENT FINDINGS:
In Western Europe, there is a significant change of techniques used for treatment of renal stones with an increase of FURS and a decrease of ESWL. The reasons for this include the change of indications, technical improvement of the endourologic armamentarium, including robotic assistance. Mostly relevant is the introduction of digital reusable and single-use flexible ureterorenoscopes, whereas micro-PCNL has been abandoned. Some companies have stopped production of lithotripters and novel ideas to improve the efficacy of shock waves have not been implemented in the actual systems. Promising shock-wave technologies include the use of burst-shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) or high-frequent ESWL. The main advantage would be the very fast pulverization of the stone as shown in in-vitro models.SUMMARY:
The role of ESWL in the management of urolithiasis is decreasing, whereas FURS is constantly progressing. Quality and safety of intracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy using holmiumYAG-laser under endoscopic control clearly outweighs the advantages of noninvasive ESWL. To regain ground, new technologies like burst-SWL or high-frequent ESWL have to be implemented in new systems.
Full text:
1
Collection:
01-internacional
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Lithotripsy
/
Kidney Calculi
/
Endoscopy
/
Robotic Surgical Procedures
Type of study:
Prognostic_studies
Limits:
Humans
Language:
En
Journal:
Curr Opin Urol
Journal subject:
UROLOGIA
Year:
2020
Document type:
Article