Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Helium radiography with a digital tracking calorimeter-a Monte Carlo study for secondary track rejection.
Pettersen, Helge Egil Seime; Volz, Lennart; Sølie, Jarle Rambo; Alme, Johan; Barnaföldi, Gergely Gábor; Barthel, Rene; van den Brink, Anthony; Borshchov, Vyacheslav; Chaar, Mamdouh; Eikeland, Viljar; Genov, Georgi; Grøttvik, Ola; Helstrup, Håvard; Keidel, Ralf; Kobdaj, Chinorat; van der Kolk, Naomi; Mehendale, Shruti; Meric, Ilker; Harald Odland, Odd; Papp, Gábor; Peitzmann, Thomas; Piersimoni, Pierluigi; Protsenko, Maksym; Ur Rehman, Attiq; Richter, Matthias; Tefre Samnøy, Andreas; Seco, Joao; Shafiee, Hesam; Songmoolnak, Arnon; Tambave, Ganesh; Tymchuk, Ihor; Ullaland, Kjetil; Varga-Kofarago, Monika; Wagner, Boris; Xiao, RenZheng; Yang, Shiming; Yokoyama, Hiroki; Röhrich, Dieter.
Affiliation
  • Pettersen HES; Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
  • Volz L; Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DEFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Sølie JR; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Alme J; Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
  • Barnaföldi GG; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Barthel R; Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary.
  • van den Brink A; Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Borshchov V; Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Chaar M; Research and Production Enterprise "LTU" (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  • Eikeland V; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Genov G; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Grøttvik O; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Helstrup H; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Keidel R; Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
  • Kobdaj C; Center for Technology and Transfer (ZTT), University of Applied Sciences Worms, Worms, Germany.
  • van der Kolk N; Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
  • Mehendale S; Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Meric I; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Harald Odland O; Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
  • Papp G; Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, 5021 Bergen, Norway.
  • Peitzmann T; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Piersimoni P; Institute for Physics, Eötvös Loránd University, 1/A Pázmány P. Sétány, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Protsenko M; Institute for Subatomic Physics, Utrecht University/Nikhef, Utrecht, Netherlands.
  • Ur Rehman A; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Richter M; Research and Production Enterprise "LTU" (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  • Tefre Samnøy A; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Seco J; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
  • Shafiee H; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Songmoolnak A; Department of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, DEFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Tambave G; Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Tymchuk I; Department of Computer Science, Electrical Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, 5020 Bergen, Norway.
  • Ullaland K; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Varga-Kofarago M; Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
  • Wagner B; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Xiao R; Research and Production Enterprise "LTU" (RPE LTU), Kharkiv, Ukraine.
  • Yang S; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
  • Yokoyama H; Wigner Research Centre for Physics, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Röhrich D; Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
Phys Med Biol ; 66(3): 035004, 2021 01 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33181502
ABSTRACT
Radiation therapy using protons and heavier ions is a fast-growing therapeutic option for cancer patients. A clinical system for particle imaging in particle therapy would enable online patient position verification, estimation of the dose deposition through range monitoring and a reduction of uncertainties in the calculation of the relative stopping power of the patient. Several prototype imaging modalities offer radiography and computed tomography using protons and heavy ions. A Digital Tracking Calorimeter (DTC), currently under development, has been proposed as one such detector. In the DTC 43 longitudinal layers of laterally stacked ALPIDE CMOS monolithic active pixel sensor chips are able to reconstruct a large number of simultaneously recorded proton tracks. In this study, we explored the capability of the DTC for helium imaging which offers favorable spatial resolution over proton imaging. Helium ions exhibit a larger cross section for inelastic nuclear interactions, increasing the number of produced secondaries in the imaged object and in the detector itself. To that end, a filtering process able to remove a large fraction of the secondaries was identified, and the track reconstruction process was adapted for helium ions. By filtering on the energy loss along the tracks, on the incoming angle and on the particle ranges, 97.5% of the secondaries were removed. After passing through 16 cm water, 50.0% of the primary helium ions survived; after the proposed filtering 42.4% of the primaries remained; finally after subsequent image reconstruction 31% of the primaries remained. Helium track reconstruction leads to more track matching errors compared to protons due to the increased available focus strength of the helium beam. In a head phantom radiograph, the Water Equivalent Path Length error envelope was 1.0 mm for helium and 1.1 mm for protons. This accuracy is expected to be sufficient for helium imaging for pre-treatment verification purposes.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Calorimetry / Radiography / Monte Carlo Method / Helium Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Phys Med Biol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Calorimetry / Radiography / Monte Carlo Method / Helium Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Phys Med Biol Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: