Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modified nodal stage of esophageal cancer based on the evaluation of the hazard rate of the negative and positive lymph node.
Zhang, Jinling; Li, Hongyan; Zhou, Liangjian; Yu, Lianling; Che, Fengyuan; Heng, Xueyuan.
Affiliation
  • Zhang J; Cancer Center of Linyi People's Hospital, Shandong University, School of Medicine, Linyi, 276000, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
  • Li H; Department of Central Laboratory, Linyi People's hospital, Shandong University, School of medicine, Linyi, 276000, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
  • Zhou L; Cancer Center of Linyi People's Hospital, Shandong University, School of Medicine, Linyi, 276000, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
  • Yu L; Cancer Center of Linyi People's Hospital, Shandong University, School of Medicine, Linyi, 276000, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
  • Che F; Department of Central Laboratory, Linyi People's hospital, Shandong University, School of medicine, Linyi, 276000, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
  • Heng X; Cancer Center of Linyi People's Hospital, Shandong University, School of Medicine, Linyi, 276000, Shandong Province, P. R. China. xueyuanheng@yahoo.com.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 1200, 2020 Dec 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33287741
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The study aimed to propose a modified N stage of esophageal cancer (EC) on the basis of the number of positive lymph node (PLN) and the number of negative lymph node (NLN) simultaneously.

METHOD:

Data from 13,491 patients with EC registered in the SEER database were reviewed. The parameters related to prognosis were investigated using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. A modified N stage was proposed based on the cut-off number of the re-adjusted ratio of the number of PLN (numberPLN) to the number of NLN (numberNLN), which were derived from the comparison of the hazard rate (HR) of numberPLN and numberNLN. The modified N stage was confirmed using the cross-validation method with the training and validation cohort, and it was also compared to the N stage from the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system (7th edition) using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

RESULTS:

The numberPLN on prognosis was 1.042, while numberNLN was 0.968. The modified N stage was defined as follows N1 stage the ratio range was from 0 to 0.21; N2 stage more than 0.21, but no more than 0.48; N3 stage more than 0.48. The log-rank test indicated that significant survival differences were confirmed among the N1, N2 and N3 sub-groups of patients in the training population. The difference of all the patients using the modified N stage method were more significant than AJCC N stage. The result of ROC analysis indicated that the modified N stage could represent the N stage of EC more accurately.

CONCLUSION:

The modified N stage based on the re-adjusted ratio of numberPLN to numberNLN can evaluate tumor stage more accurately than the traditional N stage.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Lymph Nodes Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: BMC Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2020 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Esophageal Neoplasms / Lymph Nodes Type of study: Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male Language: En Journal: BMC Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2020 Document type: Article