Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and pharmacokinetics of a biosimilar of denosumab (KN012): Phase 1 and bioequivalence study in healthy Chinese subjects.
Zhang, Hong; Li, Cuiyun; Liu, Jingrui; Wu, Min; Li, Xiaojiao; Zhu, Xiaoxue; Li, Qianqian; Wang, Boguang; Mao, Yanhong; Ding, Yanhua; Jin, Qinglong.
Affiliation
  • Zhang H; Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
  • Li C; Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
  • Liu J; Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
  • Wu M; Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
  • Li X; Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
  • Zhu X; Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
  • Li Q; Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
  • Wang B; Feiyang Biotechnology (Jilin) Co. Ltd ., China.
  • Mao Y; Feiyang Biotechnology (Jilin) Co. Ltd ., China.
  • Ding Y; Phase I Clinical Research Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
  • Jin Q; Department of Hepatology, The First Hospital of Jilin University , Jilin, China.
Expert Opin Investig Drugs ; 30(2): 185-192, 2021 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33306418
BACKGROUND: KN012 is a proposed biosimilar candidate for the reference drug denosumab, with the brand name Prolia®. This study explored the tolerance, variability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of denosumab and its biosimilar in healthy Chinese subjects. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, parallel, two-arm study was performed to analyze the bioequivalence of denosumab biosimilar (60 mg) compared with denosumab. RESULTS: The PK properties of denosumab biosimilar were similar to those of denosumab. When denosumab biosimilar was compared to denosumab, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ were 98.74%, 102.54%, and 102.18%, respectively, and the 90% confidence interval was observed to be within 80-125%. The inter-subject variability ranged from 31.4% to 34.6%. Five subjects in the denosumab biosimilar group and one subject in the denosumab group were positive for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and negative for neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). Adverse reactions were observed in 100% (52 subjects) and 94.0% (47 subjects) of the subjects in the denosumab biosimilar and denosumab groups, respectively. Reductions in the blood calcium and phosphate levels were the most common adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: The PK characteristics were comparable for the denosumab biosimilar and denosumab groups. Their safety profiles were also similar. TRIAL REGISTRATION: : The trial is registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial website (http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html #CTR20181231).
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Density Conservation Agents / Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals / Denosumab Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Expert Opin Investig Drugs Journal subject: TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Bone Density Conservation Agents / Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals / Denosumab Type of study: Clinical_trials Limits: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: En Journal: Expert Opin Investig Drugs Journal subject: TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: