Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of Proteomic Technologies for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer.
Bhardwaj, Megha; Terzer, Tobias; Schrotz-King, Petra; Brenner, Hermann.
Affiliation
  • Bhardwaj M; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Terzer T; Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Schrotz-King P; Division of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
  • Brenner H; Division of Preventive Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(3)2021 Jan 26.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33530402
ABSTRACT
Blood-based protein biomarkers are increasingly being explored as supplementary or efficient alternatives for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). The objective of the current study was to compare the diagnostic potential of proteins measured with different proteomic technologies. The concentrations of protein biomarkers were measured using proximity extension assays (PEAs), liquid chromatography/multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry (LC/MRM-MS) and quantibody microarrays (QMAs) in plasma samples of 56 CRC patients and 99 participants free of neoplasms. In another approach, proteins were measured in serum samples of 30 CRC cases and 30 participants free of neoplasm using immunome full-length functional protein arrays (IpAs). From all the measurements, 9, 6, 35 and 14 protein biomarkers overlapped for comparative evaluation of (a) PEA and LC/MRM-MS, (b) PEA and QMA, (c) PEA and IpA, and (d) LC/MRM-MS and IpA measurements, respectively. Correlation analysis was performed, along with calculation of the area under the curve (AUC) for assessing the diagnostic potential of each biomarker. DeLong's test was performed to assess the differences in AUC. Evaluation of the nine biomarkers measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS displayed correlation coefficients >+0.6, similar AUCs and DeLong's p-values indicating no differences in AUCs for biomarkers like insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 (IGFBP2), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9) and serum paraoxonase lactonase 3 (PON3). Comparing six proteins measured with PEA and QMA showed good correlation and similar diagnostic performance for only one protein, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15). The comparison of 35 proteins measured with IpA and PEA and 14 proteins analyzed with IpA and LC/MRM-MS revealed poor concordance and comparatively better AUCs when measured with PEA and LC/MRM-MS. The comparison of different proteomic technologies suggests the superior performance of novel technologies like PEA and LC/MRM-MS over the assessed array-based technologies in blood-protein-based early detection of CRC.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Proteins / Colorectal Neoplasms / Biomarkers, Tumor / Proteomics Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Mol Sci Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Blood Proteins / Colorectal Neoplasms / Biomarkers, Tumor / Proteomics Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Int J Mol Sci Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: