Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of a visual indicator on the noise level in an emergency medical dispatch centre - a pilot study.
Outrey, Justin; Pretalli, Jean-Baptiste; Pujol, Sophie; Brembilla, Alice; Desmettre, Thibaut; Lambert, Christophe; Labourey, Jean-Marc; Mauny, Frédéric; Khoury, Abdo.
Affiliation
  • Outrey J; Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Besançon University Hospital, Boulevard Fleming, 25030, Besançon cedex, France.
  • Pretalli JB; Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Besançon University Hospital, Boulevard Fleming, 25030, Besançon cedex, France.
  • Pujol S; INSERM CIC 1431, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
  • Brembilla A; INSERM CIC 1431, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
  • Desmettre T; UMR Chrono-environnement 6249, CNRS/University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25000, Besançon, France.
  • Lambert C; INSERM CIC 1431, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France.
  • Labourey JM; Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Besançon University Hospital, Boulevard Fleming, 25030, Besançon cedex, France.
  • Mauny F; UMR Chrono-environnement 6249, CNRS/University of Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 25000, Besançon, France.
  • Khoury A; Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Besançon University Hospital, Boulevard Fleming, 25030, Besançon cedex, France.
BMC Emerg Med ; 21(1): 22, 2021 02 23.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622242
BACKGROUND: Noise levels are monitored in call centres. A maximum of 52 to 55 dB(A) is recommended in order to prevent adverse events. We aimed at assessing the noise level and the impact of a visual noise indicator on the ambient noise level in a French Regional Emergency Medical Dispatch Centre (EMDC). METHODS: We conducted an observational study in the EMDC of the SAMU25 (University Hospital of Besancon). We measured the noise level using a SoundEarII® noise indicator (Dräger Medical SAS, France). The measurement took place in two phases on three consecutive days from 00:00 to 11:59 PM. At baseline, phase 1, the device recorded the average ambient noise for each minute without visual indication. Secondly, phase 2 included a sensor mounted with a light that would turn on green if noise was below 65 dB(A), orange if noise ever exceeded 65 and red if it exceeded 75 dB(A). RESULTS: In the presence of the visual noise indicator, the LAeq was significantly lower than in the absence of visual noise indicator (a mean difference of - 4.19 dB; P < 10-3). It was higher than 55 dB(A) in 84.9 and 43.9% of the time in phases 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The noise levels were frequently higher than the standards, and sometimes close to recommended limits, requiring preventive measures. The noise indicator had a positive effect on the ambient noise level. This work will allow the implementation of effective prevention solutions and, based on future assessments, could improve operators' well-being and better care for patient.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Emergency Medical Dispatch / Noise, Occupational Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMC Emerg Med Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Emergency Medical Dispatch / Noise, Occupational Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: BMC Emerg Med Journal subject: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: