Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pitfalls and challenges in genetic test interpretation: An exploration of genetic professionals experience with interpretation of results.
Donohue, Katherine E; Gooch, Catherine; Katz, Alexander; Wakelee, Jessica; Slavotinek, Anne; Korf, Bruce R.
Affiliation
  • Donohue KE; Institute for Genomic Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Gooch C; Department of Genetics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Katz A; Pediatrics, Division of Genetics and Genomic Medicine, Washington University at St Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Wakelee J; Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
  • Slavotinek A; Center for the Study of Community Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
  • Korf BR; Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Clin Genet ; 99(5): 638-649, 2021 05.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33818754
ABSTRACT
The interpretation of genetic testing results is subject to error. This observational study illustrates examples of pitfalls and challenges in interpretation of genetic testing results as reported by genetics professionals. We surveyed genetics professionals to describe interpretation challenges, the types of variants that were involved, and the reported clinical impact of misconception of a test result. Case studies were then collected from a select group to further explore potential causes of misunderstanding. A total of 83% of survey respondents were aware of at least one instance of genetic test misinterpretation. Both professionals with and without formal training in genetics were challenged by test reports, and variants of unknown significance were most frequently involved. Case submissions revealed that interpretation pitfalls extend beyond variant classification analyses. Inferred challenges in case submissions include lack of genetic counseling, unclear wording of reports, and suboptimal communication among providers. Respondents and case submitters noted that incorrect interpretation can trigger unnecessary follow-up tests and improperly alter clinical management. Further research is needed to validate and quantify large-scale data regarding challenges of genetic results interpretation.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Professional Competence / Genetic Testing / Genetics Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Genet Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Professional Competence / Genetic Testing / Genetics Type of study: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Genet Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: