Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical effects of assessing electronic patient-reported outcomes monitoring symptomatic toxicities during breast cancer therapy: a nationwide and population-based study.
Pappot, Helle; Baeksted, Christina W; Nissen, Aase; Knoop, Ann; Mitchell, Sandra A; Christensen, Jane; Hjollund, Niels Henrik; Johansen, Christoffer.
Affiliation
  • Pappot H; Documentation and Quality, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. helle.pappot@regionh.dk.
  • Baeksted CW; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. helle.pappot@regionh.dk.
  • Nissen A; Documentation and Quality, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Knoop A; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Mitchell SA; Documentation and Quality, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Christensen J; Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hjollund NH; Outcomes Research Branch, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, 3 East Suite 448, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
  • Johansen C; Documentation and Quality, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Breast Cancer ; 28(5): 1096-1099, 2021 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33837509
ABSTRACT
The involvement of cancer patients in symptom reporting talks into our cultural narrative of empowerment and participation in decisions in health of both patients and professionals. Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) is a tool applied for use in such interaction. Based on limited evidence and few empirical studies, health systems are rapidly implementing this instrument in managing patients in active treatment and in follow-up. In a cluster randomized trial of all Danish oncology departments treating breast cancer with adjuvant chemotherapy, we applied ePRO in 347 patients consecutively recruited. Our primary outcome, which was at least one treatment adjustment, was not significantly influenced using ePRO, 34% in the ePRO arm and 41% in the usual care arm received at least one treatment adjustment, p = 0.095. Number of hospitalizations and events of febrile neutropenia were not influenced by the intervention. We believe that one of the main reasons for this finding could be the application of PRO in a well-regulated treatment setting within a public health care system where the most impacting symptomatic toxicities are already taken care off.Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02996201, registered 19 Dec 2016, retrospectively registered.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Patient Reported Outcome Measures / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Patient Reported Outcome Measures / Antineoplastic Agents Type of study: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Breast Cancer Journal subject: NEOPLASIAS Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: