Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Successful surgical closure of infected abdominal wounds following preconditioning with negative pressure wound therapy.
Wagner, Johanna C; Wetz, Anja; Wiegering, Armin; Lock, Johan F; Löb, Stefan; Germer, Christoph-Thomas; Klein, Ingo.
Affiliation
  • Wagner JC; Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany. Wagner_J6@ukw.de.
  • Wetz A; Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Wiegering A; Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Lock JF; Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Löb S; Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Germer CT; Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany.
  • Klein I; Department of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberduerrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 406(7): 2479-2487, 2021 Nov.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34142218
PURPOSE: Traditionally, previous wound infection was considered a contraindication to secondary skin closure; however, several case reports describe successful secondary wound closure of wounds "preconditioned" with negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). Although this has been increasingly applied in daily practice, a systematic analysis of its feasibility has not been published thus far. The aim of this study was to evaluate secondary skin closure in previously infected abdominal wounds following treatment with NPWT. METHODS: Single-center retrospective analysis of patients with infected abdominal wounds treated with NPWT followed by either secondary skin closure referenced to a group receiving open wound therapy. Endpoints were wound closure rate, wound complications (such as recurrent infection or hernia), and perioperative data (such as duration of NPWT or hospitalization parameters). RESULTS: One hundred ninety-eight patients during 2013-2016 received a secondary skin closure after NPWT and were analyzed and referenced to 67 patients in the same period with open wound treatment after NPWT. No significant difference in BMI, chronic immunosuppressive medication, or tobacco use was found between both groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 30 days with a comparable duration in both patient groups (29 versus 33 days, p = 0.35). Interestingly, only 7.7% of patients after secondary skin closure developed recurrent surgical site infection and in over 80% of patients were discharged with closed wounds requiring only minimal outpatient wound care. CONCLUSION: Surgical skin closure following NPWT of infected abdominal wounds is a good and safe alternative to open wound treatment. It prevents lengthy outpatient wound therapy and is expected to result in a higher quality of life for patients and reduce health care costs.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Type of study: Observational_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Type of study: Observational_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: