Efficacy of antitachycardia pacing alert by remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for out-of-hospital electrical storm.

BACKGROUND: Remote monitoring (RM) has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (ICD/CRT-D). Not all devices transmit an alert for antitachycardia pacing (ATP) therapy, and it is unknown whether differences of RM alert affect the outcomes of electrical storm (ES). METHODS: We enrolled 42 patients with ICD/CRT-D whose out-of-hospital ES were detected by RM between 2013 and 2020. We divided their 54 episodes into two groups (ATP-alert-on; 22, ATP-alert-off; 32), and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: In 35 of 54 episodes of ES, ventricular tachycardia (VT) could be terminated within 24 h of ES onset just by ATP (ATP-alert-on: 14, ATP-alert-off: 21); however, many patients subsequently received shock delivery for VT. Among the 35 episodes, only in ATP-alert-on group, seven patients were prompted to visit our hospital without ICD shock through confirmation of ES by ATP-alert. Episodes that led to shock delivery 24 h or longer after the ES onset were significantly less common in the ATP-alert-on group (ATP-alert-on: 1/14, ATP-alert-off: 9/21, p = .03). Although there were no significant differences in the number of shock deliveries between episodes in the two groups, the number of ATP deliveries were significantly fewer in the ATP-alert-on group (12[7-26] vs. 29[16-53] in ATP-alert-off group, p = .03). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that the only ATP-alert significantly reduced ATP deliveries (HR = 0.14, 95%CI = 0.04-0.57, p = .003). CONCLUSION: Remote monitoring with an ATP-alert function during electrical storm may reduce appropriate ICD therapy through prompting early review.