Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current usage of stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer in Korea: patterns of care survey (KROG 19-08).
Bae, Sun Hyun; Jang, Won Il; Kang, Hyun-Cheol; Kim, Young Il; Kim, Yong Ho; Kim, Woo Chul; Lee, Hee Kwan; Kim, Jin Ho.
Affiliation
  • Bae SH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Jang WI; Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang HC; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YI; Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim YH; International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim WC; Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee HK; Jeonju Jesus Hospital, Jeollabuk-do, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim JH; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ann Transl Med ; 9(16): 1291, 2021 Aug.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34532428
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence suggests that metastasis-directed therapy and/or prostate-directed therapy may benefit patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used to treat oligometastases in various cancers. The purpose of this study was to investigate the current patterns of curative-intent SBRT for OMPC in Korea. METHODS: A 20-item questionnaire was sent to 326 radiation oncologists in 93 institutions in Korea. Only 1 physician per institution was required to complete the survey. Subsequently, the second survey consisting of 3 clinical scenarios was sent to 64 physicians with clinical experience in SBRT: case 1, cT4N0M1 (direct invasion to two pelvic bones); case 2, cT2N0M1 (three bone metastases); and case 3, solitary spine metastasis after radical prostatectomy. RESULTS: Seventy-six physicians from 93 institutions (82%) answered the first survey. The multidisciplinary team approach was practiced in 16 institutions (21%). Most physicians (75%) agreed on the definition of oligometastases as limited lesions and/or organs ≤5: 25% agreed with low-volume disease according to CHAARTED trial. During the last year, 49 physicians (64%) treated OMPC patients with curative intent. Sixty four physicians (84%) had a clinical experience with SBRT: 48 (75%) stated that both dose and fraction number should be considered when defining SBRT, whereas others (25%) stated that only fraction size should be considered. Fifty-five faculties (86%) answered the second survey. Physicians agreed with oligometastases in 89% for case 1, in 80% for case 2, and in 100% for case 3. The rate of SBRT application was the highest in case 3 (70%). CONCLUSIONS: There was diversity in the patterns of SBRT for OMPC in Korea. Additional prospective studies are necessary to strengthen evidence regarding role of SBRT in OMPC.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies Language: En Journal: Ann Transl Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies Language: En Journal: Ann Transl Med Year: 2021 Document type: Article Country of publication: