Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An evidence-based framework for determining the optimal amount of intervention for autistic children.
Trembath, David; Waddington, Hannah; Sulek, Rhylee; Varcin, Kandice; Bent, Catherine; Ashburner, Jill; Eapen, Valsamma; Goodall, Emma; Hudry, Kristelle; Silove, Natalie; Whitehouse, Andrew.
Affiliation
  • Trembath D; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
  • Waddington H; Faculty of Education, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Sulek R; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
  • Varcin K; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.
  • Bent C; Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Ashburner J; Autism Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Eapen V; Academic Unit of Child Psychiatry South West Sydney Local Health District and Ingham Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Goodall E; Healthy Possibilities, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
  • Hudry K; Department of Psychology and Counselling, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  • Silove N; School of Medicine, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Whitehouse A; Telethon Kids Institute, Northern Entrance, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia. Electronic address: andrew.whitehouse@telethonkids.org.au.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health ; 5(12): 896-904, 2021 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34672993
The provision of timely, effective, and socially valid non-pharmacological intervention is at the core of efforts to support the development of young autistic children. These efforts are intended to support children to develop skills, empower their caregivers, and lay the foundation for optimal choice, independence, and quality of life into adulthood. But what is the optimal amount of intervention? In this Viewpoint, we review current guidelines and consider evidence from an umbrella review of non-pharmacological interventions for autistic children aged up to 12 years. We show the lack of consensus on the issue, identify factors that might be relevant to consider, and present an evidence-based framework for determining the optimal amount of intervention for each child, along with recommendations for future research.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Autistic Disorder / Consensus Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Quality of Life / Autistic Disorder / Consensus Type of study: Guideline / Prognostic_studies Aspects: Patient_preference Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: