Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Pattern of Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Gadoteric Acid (Clariscan) in Patients Undergoing Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study.
Moon, Won-Jin; Cho, Young Ah; Hahn, Seok; Son, Hye Min; Woo, Sung Koo; Lee, Young Han.
Affiliation
  • Moon WJ; Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Cho YA; Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Hahn S; Department of Radiology, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Son HM; Department of Radiology, Yeungnam University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
  • Woo SK; Department of Radiology, Dong-Eui Medical Center, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee YH; Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging ; 2021: 4764348, 2021.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34803545
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Contrast-enhanced MR (CE-MR) imaging is often required to improve lesion detection and characterization and to increase diagnostic confidence. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness, as well as the use pattern, of the macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent Clariscan in real-world clinical practice in Korea. Materials and

Methods:

This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients undergoing CE-MR as part of routine clinical care at 6 university hospitals in Korea. Effectiveness was evaluated by determining diagnostic confidence and image quality; safety evaluation included the adverse event (AE) expression rate. Subgroup analyses were conducted by body regions of diagnosis (musculoskeletal, nervous system, others) and in pediatric patients (aged ≤7 years).

Results:

From October 2019 to September 2020, 1,376 subjects were included in the study. The mean volume of Clariscan used was 0.26 mL/kg (0.13 mmol/kg). In the overall study population and in each subgroup, diagnostic confidence increased after contrast enhancement with Clariscan. Overall, image quality was excellent in 72.5% of subjects and good-to-adequate in 27.2%. Clariscan was well tolerated (14 AEs occurred in 10 subjects); all AEs were of mild severity. Subgroup analyses showed that the mean dose of Clariscan used was ≥0.1 mmol/kg for nervous system-related diagnoses (e.g., brain) and ≤0.1 mmol/kg for musculoskeletal and pediatric-related diagnoses. All musculoskeletal and pediatric examinations were provided with a smaller package of 5 mL Clariscan. By body region of MR examination, the most common region was the nervous system in 69.0%, musculoskeletal system in 13.6%, and reproductive system in 4.9%.

Conclusions:

This study confirmed the use pattern of Clariscan and its excellent effectiveness and safety in the real-world clinical environment in Korea. The small-dose package indicated the possibility of increasing the convenience and efficiency of drug use.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Organometallic Compounds / Contrast Media Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2021 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Organometallic Compounds / Contrast Media Type of study: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2021 Document type: Article