Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Findings From a Friends of Cancer Research Exploratory Analysis of Real-World End Points With the Cancer Analysis System in England.
Horvat, Pia; Gray, Christen M; Lambova, Alexandrina; Christian, Jennifer B; Lasiter, Laura; Stewart, Mark; Allen, Jeff; Clarke, Paul; Chen, Cong; Reich, Adam.
Affiliation
  • Horvat P; IQVIA, London, United Kingdom.
  • Gray CM; IQVIA, London, United Kingdom.
  • Lambova A; IQVIA, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • Christian JB; IQVIA, Durham, NC.
  • Lasiter L; Friends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC.
  • Stewart M; Friends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC.
  • Allen J; Friends of Cancer Research, Washington, DC.
  • Clarke P; Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
  • Chen C; National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, London, United Kingdom.
  • Reich A; Health Data Insight CIC, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
JCO Clin Cancer Inform ; 5: 1155-1168, 2021 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34860576
PURPOSE: This study compared real-world end points extracted from the Cancer Analysis System (CAS), a national cancer registry with linkage to national mortality and other health care databases in England, with those from diverse US oncology data sources, including electronic health care records, insurance claims, unstructured medical charts, or a combination, that participated in the Friends of Cancer Research Real-World Evidence Pilot Project 1.0. Consistency between data sets and between real-world overall survival (rwOS) was assessed in patients with immunotherapy-treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with aNSCLC, diagnosed between January 2013 and December 2017, who initiated treatment with approved programmed death ligand-1 (PD-[L]1) inhibitors until March 2018 were included. Real-world end points, including rwOS and real-world time to treatment discontinuation (rwTTD), were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. A synthetic data set, Simulacrum, on the basis of conditional random sampling of the CAS data was used to develop and refine analysis scripts while protecting patient privacy. RESULTS: Characteristics (age, sex, and histology) of the 2,035 patients with immunotherapy-treated aNSCLC included in the CAS study were broadly comparable with US data sets. In CAS, a higher proportion (46.7%) of patients received a PD-(L)1 inhibitor in the first line than in US data sets (18%-30%). Median rwOS (11.4 months; 95% CI, 10.4 to 12.7) and rwTTD (4.9 months; 95% CI, 4.7 to 5.1) were within the range of US-based data sets (rwOS, 8.6-13.5 months; rwTTD, 3.2-7.0 months). CONCLUSION: The CAS findings were consistent with those from US-based oncology data sets. Such consistency is important for regulatory decision making. Differences observed between data sets may be explained by variation in health care settings, such as the timing of PD-(L)1 approval and reimbursement, and data capture.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Year: 2021 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: