Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interventional magnetic-resonance-guided cryotherapy combined with microsurgery for recurrent glioblastoma: An innovative treatment?
Cebula, H; Garnon, J; Todeschi, J; Noel, G; Lhermitte, B; Mallereau, C-H; Chibbaro, S; Burckel, H; Schott, R; de Mathelin, M; Gangi, A; Proust, F.
Affiliation
  • Cebula H; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France. Electronic address: helene.cebula@hotmail.fr.
  • Garnon J; Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Todeschi J; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Noel G; Department of Radiation Therapy, ICANS, Strasbourg, France.
  • Lhermitte B; Department of Histology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Mallereau CH; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Chibbaro S; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Burckel H; Department of Medical Oncology, ICANS, Strasbourg, France.
  • Schott R; Department of Medical Oncology, ICANS, Strasbourg, France.
  • de Mathelin M; Icube-UMR 7357 Télécom Physique, Strasbourg, France.
  • Gangi A; Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
  • Proust F; Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Neurochirurgie ; 68(3): 267-272, 2022 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34906554
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Glioblastoma invariably recurs after primary Stupp tumor therapy and portends a poor prognosis. Cryoablation is a well-established treatment strategy for extra-cranial tumors. The safety and efficacy of interventional MR-guided cryoablation (iMRgC) has not been explored in recurrent glioblastoma.

METHODS:

A retrospective analysis of data collected over a period of 24 months was performed. The inclusion criteria were (I) recurrent glioblastoma despite Stupp protocol; (II) MRI followed by histological confirmation of recurrent glioblastoma; (III) location allowing iMRgC followed by microsurgical resection; and (IV) patient's consent. The primary objective was to assess feasibility in terms of complications. The secondary objective was to analyze progression-free survival (PFS), post-iMRgC survival and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS:

The study included 6 patients, with a mean age of 67±7.6 years [range, 54-70 years]. No major complications were observed. Median PFS was 7.5 months [IQR 3.75-9.75] and 6-month PFS was 50%. Median post-iMRgC survival was 9 months [IQR 7.5-15.25] and 6-month post-iMRgC survival was 80%. Median OS was 22.5 months [IQR 21.75-30].

CONCLUSION:

iMRgC for recurrent glioblastoma demonstrated a good safety profile, with no major complications. Our data suggest improved PFS and OS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER No. IRB00011687 retrospectively registred on July 7th 2021.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Glioblastoma Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Neurochirurgie Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Neoplasms / Glioblastoma Type of study: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Neurochirurgie Year: 2022 Document type: Article