Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The ICEBERG: A score and visual representation to track the severity of traumatic brain injury: Design principles and preliminary results.
Vallée, Fabrice; Nougue, Hélène; Cartailler, Jérome; Koundé, Paul Robert; Mebazaa, Alexandre; Gayat, Etienne; Azouvi, Philippe; Mateo, Joaquim.
Affiliation
  • Vallée F; From the Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, F-75010, Paris, France (F.V., J.C., P.R.K., A.M., E.G., J.M.), Université de Paris, INSERM, U942 MASCOT, F-75006, Paris, France (F.V., J.M., H.N., J.C., R.K., A.M., E.G.); Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP Paris-Ouest, University of Paris (H.N.), Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation (P.A.), Hôpital Raymond Poincaré, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux
J Trauma Acute Care Surg ; 93(2): 229-237, 2022 08 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35001023
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Establishing neurological prognoses in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients remains challenging. To help physicians in the early management of severe TBI, we have designed a visual score (ICEBERG score) including multimodal monitoring and treatment-related criteria. We evaluated the ICEBERG scores among patients with severe TBI to predict the 28-day mortality and long-term disability (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale score at 3 years). In addition, we made a preliminary assessment of the nurses and doctors on the uptake and reception to the use of the ICEBERG visual tool.

METHODS:

This study was part of a larger prospective cohort study of 207 patients with severe TBI in the Parisian region (PariS-TBI study). The ICEBERG score included six variables from multimodal monitoring and treatment-related criteria cerebral perfusion pressure, intracranial pressure, body temperature, sedation depth, arterial partial pressure of CO 2 , and blood osmolarity. The primary outcome measures included the ICEBERG score and its relationship with hospital mortality and Extended Glasgow Outcome Score.

RESULTS:

The hospital mortality was 21% (45/207). The ICEBERG score baseline value and changes during the 72nd first hours were more strongly associated with TBI prognosis than the ICEBERG parameters measured individually. Interestingly, when the clinical and computed tomography parameters at admission were combined with the ICEBERG score at 48 hours using a multimodal approach, the predictive value was significantly increased (area under the curve = 0.92). Furthermore, comparing the ICEBERG visual representation with the traditional numerical readout revealed that changes in patient vitals were more promptly detected using ICEBERG representation ( p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION:

The ICEBERG score could represent a simple and effective method to describe severity in TBI patients, where a high score is associated with increased mortality and disability. In addition, ICEBERG representation could enhance the recognition of unmet therapeutic goals and dynamic evolution of the patient's condition. These preliminary results must be confirmed in a prospective manner. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Diagnostic Tests or Criteria; Level III.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Injuries, Traumatic Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Year: 2022 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Brain Injuries, Traumatic Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Year: 2022 Document type: Article