Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Web-Based Single Session Intervention for Perceived Control Over Anxiety During COVID-19: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Mullarkey, Michael; Dobias, Mallory; Sung, Jenna; Ahuvia, Isaac; Shumake, Jason; Beevers, Christopher; Schleider, Jessica.
Affiliation
  • Mullarkey M; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Dobias M; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Sung J; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Ahuvia I; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Shumake J; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Beevers C; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
  • Schleider J; Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
JMIR Ment Health ; 9(4): e33473, 2022 Apr 12.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35230962
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anxiety is rising across the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic, and social distancing mandates preclude in-person mental health care. Greater perceived control over anxiety has predicted decreased anxiety pathology, including adaptive responses to uncontrollable stressors. Evidence suggests that no-therapist, single-session interventions can strengthen perceived control over emotions like anxiety; similar programs, if designed for the COVID-19 context, could hold substantial public health value.

OBJECTIVE:

Our registered report evaluated a no-therapist, single-session, online intervention targeting perceived control over anxiety in the COVID-19 context against a placebo intervention encouraging handwashing. We tested whether the intervention could (1) decrease generalized anxiety and increase perceived control over anxiety and (2) achieve this without decreasing social-distancing intentions.

METHODS:

We tested these questions using a between-subjects design in a weighted-probability sample of US adults recruited via a closed online platform (ie, Prolific). All outcomes were indexed via online self-report questionnaires.

RESULTS:

Of 522 randomized individuals, 500 (95.8%) completed the baseline survey and intervention. Intent-to-treat analyses using all randomized participants (N=522) found no support for therapeutic or iatrogenic effects; effects on generalized anxiety were d=-0.06 (95% CI -0.27 to 0.15; P=.48), effects on perceived control were d=0.04 (95% CI -0.08 to 0.16; P=.48), and effects on social-distancing intentions were d=-0.02 (95% CI -0.23 to 0.19; P=.83).

CONCLUSIONS:

Strengths of this study included a large, nationally representative sample and adherence to open science practices. Implications for scalable interventions, including the challenge of targeting perceived control over anxiety, are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04459455; https//clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04459455.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: JMIR Ment Health Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Language: En Journal: JMIR Ment Health Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: