Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fecobionics Evaluation of Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Fecal Incontinence.
Futaba, Kaori; Chen, Ssu-Chi; Leung, Wing Wa; Wong, Cherry; Mak, Tony; Ng, Simon; Gregersen, Hans.
Affiliation
  • Futaba K; Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • Chen SC; Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • Leung WW; Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • Wong C; Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • Mak T; Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • Ng S; Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
  • Gregersen H; Department of Surgery, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Clin Transl Gastroenterol ; 13(5): e00491, 2022 05 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35363631
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Biofeedback therapy (BFT) is a well-known treatment for functional anorectal disorders. The effect of BFT was monitored in fecal incontinence (FI) patients with the Fecobionics test and with the conventional technologies, anorectal manometry (ARM) and balloon expulsion test (BET).

METHODS:

Studies were performed in 12 patients before and after 8 weeks of biofeedback training. The Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) score was obtained. Anal resting and squeeze pressures were measured before the bag was distended in the rectum until urge to defecate. Pressure recordings were made during Fecobionics evacuation.

RESULTS:

BFT resulted in 24% reduction in FISI scores (P < 0.01). Seven patients were characterized as responders. Anal pressures, the urge-to-defecate volume, and defecatory parameters did not change significantly during BFT. For ARM-BET, the maximum anal squeeze pressure, the urge-to-defecate volume, and the expulsion time were lower after BFT compared with those before BFT (P < 0.05). For Fecobionics, the change in urge volume (r = 0.74, P < 0.05) and the change in defecation index (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) were associated with the change in FISI score. None of the ARM-BET parameters were associated with the change in FISI score. It was studied whether any pre-BFT data could predict treatment success. The Fecobionics expulsion duration and the defecation index predicted the outcome (P < 0.05). The defecation index had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 72%. None of the ARM-BET parameters predicted the outcome (all P > 0.2).

DISCUSSION:

Fecobionics was used as a tool to monitor the effect of BFT and proved better than conventional technologies for monitoring and predicting the outcome in the FISI score.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biofeedback, Psychology / Fecal Incontinence Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Biofeedback, Psychology / Fecal Incontinence Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Transl Gastroenterol Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: