Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Using Indigenous Standards to Implement the CARE Principles: Setting Expectations through Tribal Research Codes.
Carroll, Stephanie Russo; Garba, Ibrahim; Plevel, Rebecca; Small-Rodriguez, Desi; Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y; Hudson, Maui; Garrison, Nanibaa' A.
Affiliation
  • Carroll SR; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Garba I; Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Plevel R; Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Small-Rodriguez D; Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Hiratsuka VY; Native Nations Institute, Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Hudson M; Library and Information Sciences, School of Information, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
  • Garrison NA; Law Library, School of Law, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Front Genet ; 13: 823309, 2022.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35386282
ABSTRACT
Biomedical data are now organized in large-scale databases allowing researchers worldwide to access and utilize the data for new projects. As new technologies generate even larger amounts of data, data governance and data management are becoming pressing challenges. The FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) were developed to facilitate data sharing. However, the Indigenous Data Sovereignty movement advocates for greater Indigenous control and oversight in order to share data on Indigenous Peoples' terms. This is especially true in the context of genetic research where Indigenous Peoples historically have been unethically exploited in the name of science. This article outlines the relationship between sovereignty and ethics in the context of data to describe the collective rights that Indigenous Peoples assert to increase control over their biomedical data. Then drawing on the CARE Principles for Indigenous Data Governance (Collective benefit, Authority to control, Responsibility, and Ethics), we explore how standards already set by Native nations in the United States, such as tribal research codes, provide direction for implementation of the CARE Principles to complement FAIR. A broader approach to policy and procedure regarding tribal participation in biomedical research is required and we make recommendations for tribes, institutions, and ethical practice.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Aspects: Ethics Language: En Journal: Front Genet Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline Aspects: Ethics Language: En Journal: Front Genet Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: