Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Leaf water potential measurements using the pressure chamber: Synthetic testing of assumptions towards best practices for precision and accuracy.
Rodriguez-Dominguez, Celia M; Forner, Alicia; Martorell, Sebastia; Choat, Brendan; Lopez, Rosana; Peters, Jennifer M R; Pfautsch, Sebastian; Mayr, Stefan; Carins-Murphy, Madeline R; McAdam, Scott A M; Richardson, Freya; Diaz-Espejo, Antonio; Hernandez-Santana, Virginia; Menezes-Silva, Paulo E; Torres-Ruiz, Jose M; Batz, Timothy A; Sack, Lawren.
Affiliation
  • Rodriguez-Dominguez CM; Protection of the Soil, Plant, Water System, Irrigation and Crop Ecophysiology Group, IRNAS-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Forner A; Plant Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant Molecular Ecophysiology, IRNAS-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Martorell S; Department of Biogeography and Global Change, International Global Change Laboratory (LINCGlobal), Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid, Spain.
  • Choat B; Department of Ecology, Centro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), University of València and Generalitat Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.
  • Lopez R; Departament de Biologia, Research Group on Plant Biology under Mediterranean Conditions, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
  • Peters JMR; Plants, Animals and Interactions, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Pfautsch S; Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Mayr S; Division of Environmental Science, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Climate Change Science Institute, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.
  • Carins-Murphy MR; Geography, Tourism and Urban Planning, Urban Studies, School of Social Science and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
  • McAdam SAM; Department of Botany, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Richardson F; Plant Sciences, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
  • Diaz-Espejo A; Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.
  • Hernandez-Santana V; Plant Sciences, Discipline of Biological Sciences, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
  • Menezes-Silva PE; Protection of the Soil, Plant, Water System, Irrigation and Crop Ecophysiology Group, IRNAS-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Torres-Ruiz JM; Plant Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant Molecular Ecophysiology, IRNAS-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Batz TA; Protection of the Soil, Plant, Water System, Irrigation and Crop Ecophysiology Group, IRNAS-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
  • Sack L; Plant Biotechnology, Laboratory of Plant Molecular Ecophysiology, IRNAS-CSIC, Sevilla, Spain.
Plant Cell Environ ; 45(7): 2037-2061, 2022 07.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35394651
Leaf water potential (ψleaf ), typically measured using the pressure chamber, is the most important metric of plant water status, providing high theoretical value and information content for multiple applications in quantifying critical physiological processes including drought responses. Pressure chamber measurements of ψleaf (ψleafPC ) are most typical, yet, the practical complexity of the technique and of the underlying theory has led to ambiguous understanding of the conditions to optimize measurements. Consequently, specific techniques and precautions diversified across the global research community, raising questions of reliability and repeatability. Here, we surveyed specific methods of ψleafPC from multiple laboratories, and synthesized experiments testing common assumptions and practices in ψleafPC for diverse species: (i) the need for equilibration of previously transpiring leaves; (ii) leaf storage before measurement; (iii) the equilibration of ψleaf for leaves on bagged branches of a range of dehydration; (iv) the equilibration of ψleaf across the lamina for bagged leaves, and the accuracy of measuring leaves with artificially 'elongated petioles'; (v) the need in ψleaf measurements for bagging leaves and high humidity within the chamber; (vi) the need to avoid liquid water on leaf surfaces; (vii) the use of 'pulse' pressurization versus gradual pressurization; and (viii) variation among experimenters in ψleafPC determination. Based on our findings we provide a best practice protocol to maximise accuracy, and provide recommendations for ongoing species-specific tests of important assumptions in future studies.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water / Plant Leaves Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: Plant Cell Environ Journal subject: BOTANICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Water / Plant Leaves Type of study: Guideline Language: En Journal: Plant Cell Environ Journal subject: BOTANICA Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: