Image Quality of High-Resolution 3-Dimensional Neck MRI Using CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and GRASP-VIBE: An Intraindividual Comparative Study.

OBJECTIVES: Acquiring high-quality magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head and neck region is often challenging due to motion and susceptibility artifacts. This study aimed to compare image quality of 2 high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) MRI sequences of the neck, controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA)-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE), and golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging (GRASP)-VIBE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-three patients indicated for contrast-enhanced neck MRI examination were scanned using 3 T scanners and both CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and GRASP-VIBE with nearly isotropic 3D acquisitions (<1 mm in-plane resolution with analogous acquisition times). Patients' MRI scans were independently rated by 2 radiologists using a 5-grade Likert scale for overall image quality, artifact level, mucosal and lesion conspicuity, and fat suppression degree at separate anatomical regions. Interobserver agreement was calculated using the Cohen κ coefficient. The quality ratings of both sequences were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Nonuniformity and contrast-to-noise ratio values were measured in all subjects. Separate MRI scans were performed twice for each sequence in a phantom and healthy volunteer without contrast injection to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). RESULTS: The scores of overall image quality, overall artifact level, motion artifact level, and conspicuity of the nasopharynx, oropharynx, oral cavity, hypopharynx, and larynx were all significantly higher in GRASP-VIBE than in CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (all P 's < 0.001). Moderate to substantial interobserver agreement was observed in overall image quality (GRASP-VIBE κ = 0.43; CAIPIRINHA-VIBE κ = 0.59) and motion artifact level (GRASP-VIBE κ = 0.51; CAIPIRINHA-VIBE κ = 0.65). Lesion conspicuity was significantly higher in GRASP-VIBE than in CAIPIRINHA-VIBE ( P = 0.005). The degree of fat suppression was weaker in the lower neck regions in GRASP-VIBE (3.90 ± 0.72) than in CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (4.97 ± 0.21) ( P < 0.001). The contrast-to-noise ratio at hypopharyngeal level was significantly higher in GRASP-VIBE (6.28 ± 4.77) than in CAIPIRINHA-VIBE (3.14 ± 9.95) ( P < 0.001). In the phantom study, the SNR of GRASP-VIBE was 12 times greater than that of CAIPIRINHA-VIBE. The in vivo SNR of the volunteer MRI scan was 13.6 in CAIPIRINHA-VIBE and 20.7 in GRASP-VIBE. CONCLUSIONS: Both sequences rendered excellent images for head and neck MRI scans. GRASP-VIBE provided better image quality, as well as mucosal and lesion conspicuities, with less motion artifacts, whereas CAIPIRINHA-VIBE provided better fat suppression in the lower neck regions.