Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changes in Spina Bifida Lesion Level after Folic Acid Fortification in the US.
Mai, Cara T; Evans, Jane; Alverson, Clinton J; Yue, Xin; Flood, Timothy; Arnold, Kathryn; Nestoridi, Eirini; Denson, Lindsay; Adisa, Olufunmilola; Moore, Cynthia A; Nance, Amy; Zielke, Katherine; Rice, Sydney; Shan, Xiaoyi; Dean, Jane H; Ethen, Mary; Hansen, Brenda; Isenburg, Jennifer; Kirby, Russell S.
Affiliation
  • Mai CT; Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: cwm7@cdc.gov.
  • Evans J; University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Alverson CJ; Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Yue X; Eagle Global Scientific, Atlanta, GA.
  • Flood T; Bureau of Public Health Statistics, Arizona Department of Health Services, Phoenix, AZ.
  • Arnold K; Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Nestoridi E; Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Bureau of Family Health and Nutrition, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, MA.
  • Denson L; Oklahoma Birth Defects Registry, Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, OK.
  • Adisa O; Eagle Global Scientific, Atlanta, GA.
  • Moore CA; Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Nance A; Utah Birth Defect Network, Office of Children with Special Health Care Needs, Utah Department of Health and Human Services, Salt Lake City, UT.
  • Zielke K; South Carolina Birth Defects Program, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control, Columbia, SC.
  • Rice S; University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
  • Shan X; Arkansas Children's Research Institute, Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AK.
  • Dean JH; Greenwood Genetic Center, Greenwood, SC.
  • Ethen M; Birth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX.
  • Hansen B; California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, Genetic Disease Screening Program/Center for Family Health, California Department of Public Health, Sacramento, CA.
  • Isenburg J; Division of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
  • Kirby RS; College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL.
J Pediatr ; 249: 59-66.e1, 2022 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35772508
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the severity of cases of spina bifida changed after the institution of mandatory folic acid fortification in the US. STUDY DESIGN: Six active population-based birth defects programs provided data on cases of spina bifida for 1992-1996 (prefortification period) and 1999-2016 (postfortification period). The programs contributed varying years of data. Case information included both a medical record verbatim text description of the spina bifida diagnosis and spina bifida codes (International Classification of Diseases, Clinical Modification, or a modified birth defects surveillance coding system). Comparing the prefortification and postfortification periods, aORs for case severity (upper-level lesions [cervical, thoracic] vs lower-level lesions [lumbar, sacral]) and prevalence ratios (PRs) were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 2593 cases of spina bifida (out of 7 816 062 live births) met the inclusion criteria, including 573 cases from the prefortification period and 2020 cases from the postfortification period. Case severity decreased by 70% (aOR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.26-0.35) between the fortification periods. The decrease was most pronounced for non-Hispanic White mothers. Overall spina bifida prevalence declined by 23% (PR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.85), with similar reductions seen across the early, mid, and recent postfortification periods. A statistically significant decrease in upper-level lesions occurred in the postfortification period compared with the prefortification period (PR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.22-0.34), whereas the prevalence of lower-level lesions remained relatively similar (PR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of spina bifida cases decreased after mandatory folic acid fortification in the US. Further examination is warranted to better understand the potential effect of folic acid on spina bifida severity.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Dysraphism / Folic Acid Type of study: Prevalence_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Pediatr Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Dysraphism / Folic Acid Type of study: Prevalence_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: J Pediatr Year: 2022 Document type: Article Country of publication: