Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Characterization of Casirivimab Plus Imdevimab, Sotrovimab, and Bamlanivimab Plus Etesevimab-Derived Interference in Serum Protein Electrophoresis and Immunofixation Electrophoresis.
Scholl, Ashley Rose; Korentzelos, Dimitrios; Forns, Taylor E; Brenneman, Ethan K; Kelm, Matthew; Datto, Michael; Wheeler, Sarah E; Carlsen, Eric D.
Affiliation
  • Scholl AR; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham NC, USA.
  • Korentzelos D; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA.
  • Forns TE; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham NC, USA.
  • Brenneman EK; Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham NC, USA.
  • Kelm M; Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham NC, USA.
  • Datto M; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham NC, USA.
  • Wheeler SE; Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh PA, USA.
  • Carlsen ED; Department of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham NC, USA.
J Appl Lab Med ; 7(6): 1379-1387, 2022 Oct 29.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35993812
BACKGROUND: Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies can be a source of assay interference in clinical serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation electrophoresis (IFE), producing monoclonal bands that can be misinterpreted as a monoclonal gammopathy related to a B-cell or plasma cell neoplasm. The extent to which new anti-COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies produce this interference is unknown. METHODS: Casirivimab plus imdevimab, sotrovimab, and bamlanivimab plus etesevimab were spiked into patient serum samples to evaluate for SPEP/IFE interference, to characterize the position of therapy-derived bands relative to a reference band (either combined beta band or beta 1 band, depending on instrument platform), and to confirm heavy and light chain utilization of each medication. Serum samples from patients who had recently received casirivimab plus imdevimab or sotrovimab were also evaluated for comparison. RESULTS: When spiked into serum samples, all tested anti-COVID-19 monoclonal antibodies generated interference in SPEP/IFE. Importantly, the patterns of interference differed between spiked serum samples and serum from patients who had recently received casirivimab plus imdevimab or sotrovimab. CONCLUSIONS: Imdevimab can be added to the growing list of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies that produce sustained interference in SPEP/IFE. Although casirivimab and sotrovimab also produce assay interference in vitro, these antibodies are not reliably detected in serum from recently infused patients. The value of relative band position in recognizing bands that may represent therapeutic monoclonal antibodies is also emphasized. Clinicians and laboratorians should consider therapeutic monoclonal antibody interference in diagnostic SPEP/IFE and review a patient's medication list when new or transient monoclonal bands are identified.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / COVID-19 Drug Treatment / Antibodies, Monoclonal Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Appl Lab Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / COVID-19 Drug Treatment / Antibodies, Monoclonal Type of study: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Appl Lab Med Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: