Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Microbial Aerosols Generated from Standard Microbiological Laboratory Procedures.
Pottage, Thomas; Ngabo, Didier; Parks, Simon; Hookway, Helen; Verlander, Neville Q; Kojima, Kazunobu; Bennett, Allan M.
Affiliation
  • Pottage T; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
  • Ngabo D; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
  • Parks S; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
  • Hookway H; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
  • Verlander NQ; Statistics, Modelling and Economics Department, UK Health Security Agency, London, United Kingdom.
  • Kojima K; World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • Bennett AM; Research and Evaluation, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Appl Biosaf ; 27(2): 92-99, 2022 Jun 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36035500
Background: Modern microbiology laboratories are designed to protect workers and the environment from microbial aerosols produced during microbiological procedures and accidents. However, there is only limited data available on the aerosols generated from common microbiology procedures. Methods: A series of common microbiological procedures were undertaken with high concentration spore suspensions while air samplers were operated to sample the aerosols generated. Surface contamination from droplets was visualized using sodium fluorescein within the suspension. A total of 36 procedures were studied using different sample volumes (0.1-10 mL) and two spore suspension titers (107 and 109 colony forming units [cfu]/mL). Results: The aerosol concentrations generated varied from 0 to 13,000 cfu/m3. There was evidence to suggest that titer, volume, and poor use of equipment were significant factors in increased aerosol generation from some of the procedures. A risk assessment undertaken using the data showed that any aerosol generated from these processes would be contained within a correctly operating biological safety cabinet. Therefore, with these procedures, the operator and the environment would not require any additional protective measures such as respiratory protective equipment or a negative pressure laboratory to prevent aerosol exposure or release. Conclusions: Aerosol generation from common laboratory processes can be minimized by reducing sample volumes and concentrations if possible. Training laboratory staff in good microbiological techniques would further mitigate aerosols generated from common laboratory processes.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Appl Biosaf Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Language: En Journal: Appl Biosaf Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: