Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An International Consensus on the Design of Prospective Clinical-Translational Trials in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Advanced Gynecologic Cancer.
Amendola, Beatriz E; Mahadevan, Anand; Blanco Suarez, Jesus Manuel; Griffin, Robert J; Wu, Xiaodong; Perez, Naipy C; Hippe, Daniel S; Simone, Charles B; Mohiuddin, Majid; Mohiuddin, Mohammed; Snider, James W; Zhang, Hualin; Le, Quynh-Thu; Mayr, Nina A.
Affiliation
  • Amendola BE; Innovative Cancer Institute, South Miami, FL 33143, USA.
  • Mahadevan A; Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, Langone Health, New York, NY 10016, USA.
  • Blanco Suarez JM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. Negrin University Hospital, 35010 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
  • Griffin RJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA.
  • Wu X; Executive Medical Physics Associates, Miami, FL 33179, USA.
  • Perez NC; Innovative Cancer Institute, South Miami, FL 33143, USA.
  • Hippe DS; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
  • Simone CB; Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA.
  • Mohiuddin M; Radiation Oncology Consultants and Northwestern Proton Center, Warrenville, IL 60555, USA.
  • Mohiuddin M; Radiation Oncology, Scottsdale, AZ 85258, USA.
  • Snider JW; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35233, USA.
  • Zhang H; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
  • Le QT; Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
  • Mayr NA; College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(17)2022 Aug 31.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36077802
Despite the unexpectedly high tumor responses and limited treatment-related toxicities observed with SFRT, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. High variability of SFRT technologies and methods, unfamiliar complex dose and prescription concepts for heterogeneous dose and uncertainty regarding systemic therapies present major obstacles towards clinical trial development. To address these challenges, the consensus guideline reported here aimed at facilitating trial development and feasibility through a priori harmonization of treatment approach and the full range of clinical trial design parameters for SFRT trials in gynecologic cancer. Gynecologic cancers were evaluated for the status of SFRT pilot experience. A multi-disciplinary SFRT expert panel for gynecologic cancer was established to develop the consensus through formal panel review/discussions, appropriateness rank voting and public comment solicitation/review. The trial design parameters included eligibility/exclusions, endpoints, SFRT technology/technique, dose/dosimetric parameters, systemic therapies, patient evaluations, and embedded translational science. Cervical cancer was determined as the most suitable gynecologic tumor for an SFRT trial. Consensus emphasized standardization of SFRT dosimetry/physics parameters, biologic dose modeling, and specimen collection for translational/biological endpoints, which may be uniquely feasible in cervical cancer. Incorporation of brachytherapy into the SFRT regimen requires additional pre-trial pilot investigations. Specific consensus recommendations are presented and discussed.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Cancers (Basel) Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Guideline / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: Cancers (Basel) Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: