Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lattice Radiation Therapy in clinical practice: A systematic review.
Iori, Federico; Cappelli, Anna; D'Angelo, Elisa; Cozzi, Salvatore; Ghersi, Sebastiano Finocchi; De Felice, Francesca; Ciammella, Patrizia; Bruni, Alessio; Iotti, Cinzia.
Affiliation
  • Iori F; Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Cappelli A; Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, 41121 Modena, Italy.
  • D'Angelo E; Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, 41121 Modena, Italy.
  • Cozzi S; Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Ghersi SF; Radiation Oncolgy Unit, AOU Sant'Andrea, Facoltà di Medicina e Psicologia, Università La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy.
  • De Felice F; Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.
  • Ciammella P; Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Bruni A; Radiotherapy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, 41121 Modena, Italy.
  • Iotti C; Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42124 Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol ; 39: 100569, 2023 Mar.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36590825
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Lattice radiation therapy (LRT) is an innovative type of spatially fractionated radiation therapy. It aims to increase large tumors control probability by administering ablative doses without an increased toxicity. Considering the rising number of positive clinical experiences, the objective of this work is to evaluate LRT safety and efficacy.

Method:

Reports about LRT clinical experience were identified with a systematic review conducted on four different databases (namely, Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) through the August 2022. Only LRT clinical reports published in English and with the access to the full manuscript text were considered as eligible. The 2020 update version PRISMA statement was followed.

Results:

Data extraction was performed from 12 eligible records encompassing 7 case reports, 1 case series, and 4 clinical studies. 81 patients (84 lesions) with a large lesion ranging from 63.2 cc to 3713.5 cc were subjected to exclusive, hybrid, and metabolism guided LRT. Excluding two very severe toxicity with a questionable relation with LRT, available clinical experience seem to confirm LRT safety. When a complete response was not achieved 3-6 months after LRT, a median lesion reduction approximately ≥50 % was registered.

Conclusion:

This systematic review appear to suggest LRT safety, especially for exclusive LRT. The very low level of evidence and the studies heterogeneity preclude drawing definitive conclusions on LRT efficacy, even though an interesting trend in terms of lesions reduction has been described.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Systematic_reviews Language: En Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: