Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study.
Zhang, Hui Xia; Li, Fei; Jin, Haixia; Song, Wen Yan; Su, Yingchun; Li, Gang.
Affiliation
  • Zhang HX; Centre for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Li F; Henan Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Jin H; Centre for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Song WY; Henan Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Su Y; Centre for Reproductive Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
  • Li G; Henan Key Laboratory of Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 23(1): 5, 2023 Jan 04.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36600221
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To explore the incidence of retained embryos (REs) in embryo transfer (ET) cycles and its effects on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS:

This was a matched retrospective cohort study involving 29,160 ET cycles conducted from March 2016 to February 2021, in which ET cycles without RE were matched to the RE group at a 21 ratio. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates were compared between the with-RE and without-RE groups.

RESULTS:

Our study showed that the overall incidence of REs was 0.33% (95/29,160). There was a statistically significant difference in RE rate among the operators (P < 0.001), suggesting that the embryo retention rate may be affected by the individual operator. A total of 95 repeated ET cycles due to RE were included in the study group, and 190 ET cycles without RE were matched to the study group (12). There were no significant differences between the RE and matched groups in terms of implantation rate (35.6 vs. 38.0%; P = 0.608), clinical pregnancy rate (47.4 vs. 54.7%; P = 0.240), biochemical pregnancy rate (5.3 vs. 4.7%; P = 0.846), miscarriage rate (11.1 vs. 9.6%; P = 0.781), ectopic pregnancy rate (2.2 vs. 1.9%; P = 1.000) or live birth rate (41.1 vs. 48.9%; P = 0.208).

CONCLUSIONS:

The present findings demonstrated that immediate retransfer of REs did not significantly affect IVF outcomes, which may provide counselling information for patients when REs are identified and ET is reattempted. The incidence of REs was associated with the operator who expelled the embryos from the catheter. Attention to detail and frequent assessment of the operator's technique may facilitate avoidance of embryo retention.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pregnancy Outcome / Abortion, Spontaneous Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Journal subject: OBSTETRICIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pregnancy Outcome / Abortion, Spontaneous Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: En Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Journal subject: OBSTETRICIA Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: