Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
BrazIliaN Type 1 & 2 DiabetEs Disease Registry (BINDER): longitudinal, real-world study of diabetes mellitus control in Brazil.
de Almeida-Pititto, Bianca; Eliaschewitz, Freddy G; de Paula, Mauricio A; Ferreira, Graziela C.
Affiliation
  • de Almeida-Pititto B; Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Eliaschewitz FG; Centro de Pesquisas Clinicas (CPCLIN)/Diagnósticos da América S.A (DASA), Centro de Pesquisas Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Paula MA; Sanofi, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Ferreira GC; Sanofi, São Paulo, Brazil.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36992732
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

This study aimed at assessing the patterns of care and glycemic control of patients with diabetes (DM) in real life during a follow-up of 2 years in the public and private health sectors in Brazil.

Methods:

BINDER was an observational study of patients >18 years old, with type-1 (T1DM) and type-2 DM (T2DM), followed at 250 sites from 40 cities across the five regions of Brazil. The results for the 1,266 participants who were followed for 2 years are presented. Main

results:

Most patients were Caucasians (75%), male (56.7%) and from the private health sector (71%). Of the 1,266 patients who entered the analysis, 104 (8.2%) had T1DM and 1162 (91.8%) had T2DM. Patients followed in the private sector represented 48% of the patients with T1DM and 73% of those with T2DM. For T1DM, in addition to insulins (NPH in 24%, regular in 11%, long-acting analogues in 58%, fast-acting analogues in 53%, and others in 12%), the patients received biguanide (20%), SGLT2-I (4%), and GLP-1Ra (<1%). After 2 years, 13% of T1DM patients were using biguanide, 9% SGLT2-I, 1% GLP-1Ra, and 1% pioglitazone; the use of NPH and regular insulins decreased to 13% and 8%, respectively, while 72% were receiving long-acting insulin analogues, and 78% fast-acting insulin analogues. Treatment for T2DM consisted of biguanide (77%), sulfonylureas (33%), DPP4 inhibitors (24%), SGLT2-I (13%), GLP-1Ra (2.5%), and insulin (27%), with percentages not changing during follow-up. Regarding glucose control, mean HbA1c at baseline and after 2 years of follow-up was 8.2 (1.6)% and 7.5 (1.6)% for T1DM, and 8.4 (1.9)% and 7.2 (1.3)% for T2DM, respectively. After 2 years, HbA1c<7% was reached in 25% of T1DM and 55% of T2DM patients from private institutions and in 20.5% of T1DM and 47% of T2DM from public institutions.

Conclusion:

Most patients did not reach the HbA1c target in private or public health systems. At the 2-year follow-up, there were no significant improvements in HbA1c in either T1DM or T2DM, which suggests an important clinical inertia.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Front Clin Diabetes Healthc Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational_studies Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Brasil Language: En Journal: Front Clin Diabetes Healthc Year: 2022 Document type: Article Affiliation country: