Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reference values for 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging of the portal venous system.
Huang, Andrew; Roberts, Grant S; Roldán-Alzate, Alejandro; Wieben, Oliver; Reeder, Scott B; Oechtering, Thekla H.
Affiliation
  • Huang A; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Roberts GS; Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Roldán-Alzate A; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Wieben O; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Reeder SB; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
  • Oechtering TH; Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 48(6): 2049-2059, 2023 06.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37016247
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this work was to establish normal reference values for 4D flow MRI-derived flow, velocity, and vessel diameters, and to define characteristic flow patterns in the portal venous system of healthy adult subjects.

METHODS:

For this retrospective study, we screened all available 4D flow MRI exams of the upper abdomen in healthy adults acquired at our institution between 2012 and 2022 at either 1.5 T or 3.0 T MRI after ≥ 5 h fasting. Flow, velocity, and effective diameter were quantified in the 8 planes in the portal venous system (splenic vein, superior mesenteric vein, main, right, and left portal veins). Vessel delineation was manually adjusted over time. Reference ranges for were defined as the mean ± 2 standard deviations. Three readers noted helical and vortical flow on time-resolved pathline visualizations. Conservation of mass flow analysis was performed for quality assurance.

RESULTS:

We included 44 healthy subjects (26 female, 18-74 years) in the analysis. We report reference values for mean and peak flow, mean velocity, and vessel diameter in the healthy portal vein using 4D flow MRI. Normal flow patterns in the portal vein included faint helical (66%) or linear flow (34%). Conservation of mass analysis demonstrated a relative error of 1.1 ± 4.6% standard deviation (SD) at the splenomesenteric confluence and - 1.4 ± 4.1% SD at the portal bifurcation.

CONCLUSION:

We have reported normal hemodynamic values that are necessary baseline data for emerging clinical applications of 4D flow MRI in the portal venous system. Results are consistent with previously published values from smaller cohorts.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Abdomen Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Abdomen Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Adult / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Year: 2023 Document type: Article Affiliation country: