Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Impact of Sedation on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Adverse Events after Surveillance Esophagogastroduodenoscopy in Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
Kim, Sang Yoon; Lee, Jun Kyu; Lee, Kwang Hyuck; Jang, Jae-Young; Kim, Byung-Wook.
Affiliation
  • Kim SY; Department of Internal Medicine, Myongji Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
  • Lee JK; Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
  • Lee KH; Department of Internal Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Jang JY; Department of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim BW; Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.
Gut Liver ; 18(2): 245-256, 2024 Mar 15.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37317513
ABSTRACT
Background/

Aims:

The impact of sedation on cardio-cerebrovascular (CCV) adverse events after esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) in patients with gastric cancer (GC) is unclear. We investigated the incidence rate and impact of sedation on CCV adverse events after surveillance EGD in patients with GC.

Methods:

We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study using the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service databases from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. Using a propensity score-matched analysis, patients with GC were divided into two groups sedative agent users and nonusers for surveillance EGD. We compared the occurrence of CCV adverse events within 14 days between the two groups.

Results:

Of the 103,463 patients with GC, newly diagnosed CCV adverse events occurred in 2.57% of patients within 14 days after surveillance EGD. Sedative agents were used in 41.3% of the patients during EGD. The incidence rates of CCV adverse events with and without sedation were 173.6/10,000 and 315.4/10,000, respectively. Between sedative agent users and nonusers based on propensity score matching (28,008 pairs), there were no significant differences in the occurrence of 14-day CCV, cardiac, cerebral, and other vascular adverse events (2.28% vs 2.22%, p=0.69; 1.44% vs 1.31%, p=0.23; 0.74% vs 0.84%, p=0.20; 0.10% vs 0.07%, p=0.25, respectively).

Conclusions:

Sedation during surveillance EGD was not associated with CCV adverse events in patients with GC. Therefore, the use of sedative agents may be considered in patients with GC during surveillance EGD without excessive concerns about CCV adverse events.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Gut Liver Year: 2024 Document type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Stomach Neoplasms Type of study: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Gut Liver Year: 2024 Document type: Article