Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of the Uniform Data Set version 3 teleneuropsychological measures.
Gierzynski, Theresa F; Gregoire, Allyson; Reader, Jonathan M; Pantis, Rebecca; Campbell, Stephen; Bhaumik, Arijit; Rahman-Filipiak, Annalise; Heidebrink, Judith; Giordani, Bruno; Paulson, Henry; Hampstead, Benjamin M.
Affiliation
  • Gierzynski TF; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Gregoire A; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Reader JM; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Pantis R; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Campbell S; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Bhaumik A; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Rahman-Filipiak A; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Heidebrink J; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Giordani B; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Paulson H; Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Hampstead BM; Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc ; 30(2): 183-193, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37366070
OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated in-home teleneuropsychological (teleNP) assessment and none, to our knowledge, has evaluated the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center's (NACC) Uniform Data Set version 3 tele-adapted test battery (UDS v3.0 t-cog). The current study evaluates the reliability of the in-home UDS v3.0 t-cog with a prior in-person UDS v3.0 evaluation. METHOD: One hundred and eighty-one cognitively unimpaired or cognitively impaired participants from a longitudinal study of memory and aging completed an in-person UDS v3.0 and a subsequent UDS v3.0 t-cog evaluation (∼16 months apart) administered either via video conference (n = 122) or telephone (n = 59). RESULTS: We calculated intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) between each time point for the entire sample. ICCs ranged widely (0.01-0.79) but were generally indicative of "moderate" (i.e., ICCs ranging from 0.5-0.75) to "good" (i.e., ICCs ranging from 0.75-0.90) agreement. Comparable ICCs were evident when looking only at those with stable diagnoses. However, relatively stronger ICCs (Range: 0.35-0.87) were found between similarly timed in-person UDS v3.0 evaluations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that most tests on the UDS v3.0 t-cog battery may serve as a viable alternative to its in-person counterpart, though reliability may be attenuated relative to the traditional in-person format. More tightly controlled studies are needed to better establish the reliability of these measures.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aging / Knowledge Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Aging / Knowledge Type of study: Observational_studies Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOLOGIA Year: 2024 Document type: Article Affiliation country: Country of publication: