Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early Experience of Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Definitive Radiation of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.
Avkshtol, Vladimir; Meng, Boyu; Shen, Chenyang; Choi, Byong Su; Okoroafor, Chikasirimobi; Moon, Dominic; Sher, David; Lin, Mu-Han.
Affiliation
  • Avkshtol V; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Meng B; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Shen C; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Choi BS; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Okoroafor C; Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
  • Moon D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Sher D; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
  • Lin MH; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Adv Radiat Oncol ; 8(5): 101256, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37408672
Purpose: The advent of cone beam computed tomography-based online adaptive radiation therapy (oART) has dramatically reduced the barriers of adaptation. We present the first prospective oART experience data in radiation of head and neck cancers (HNC). Methods and Materials: Patients with HNC receiving definitive standard fractionation (chemo)radiation who underwent at least 1 oART session were enrolled in a prospective registry study. The frequency of adaptations was at the discretion of the treating physician. Physicians were given the option of delivering 1 of 2 plans during adaptation: the original radiation plan transposed onto the cone beam computed tomography with adapted contours (scheduled), and a new adapted plan generated from the updated contours (adapted). A paired t test was used to compare the mean doses between scheduled and adapted plans. Results: Twenty-one patients (15 oropharynx, 4 larynx/hypopharynx, 2 other) underwent 43 adaptation sessions (median, 2). The median ART process time was 23 minutes, median physician time at the console was 27 minutes, and median patient time in the vault was 43.5 minutes. The adapted plan was chosen 93% of the time. The mean volume in each planned target volume (PTV) receiving 100% of the prescription dose for the scheduled versus adapted plan for high-risk PTVs was 87.8% versus 95% (P < .01), intermediate-risk PTVs was 87.3% versus 97.9% (P < .01), and low-risk PTVs was 94% versus 97.8% (P < .01), respectively. The mean hotspot was also lower with adaptation: 108.8% versus 106.4% (P < .01). All but 1 organ at risk (11/12) saw a decrease in their dose with the adapted plans, with the mean ipsilateral parotid (P = .013), mean larynx (P < .01), maximum point spinal cord (P < .01), and maximum point brain stem (P = .035) reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: Online ART is feasible for HNC, with significant improvement in target coverage and homogeneity and a modest decrease in doses to several organs at risk.

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication:

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Year: 2023 Document type: Article Country of publication: