Lenvatinib plus sintilimab with or without transarterial chemoembolization for intermediate or advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score-matching cohort study.

In this retrospective study, we compared the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib plus sintilimab, with or without transarterial chemoembolization (TLS vs. LS), in patients with intermediate or advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Eligible patients who received combination therapy with TLS or LS at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute & Hospital from December 2018 to October 2020 were propensity score matched (PSM) to correct for potential confounding biases between the two groups. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors. The study included 152 patients (LS group, n=54, TLS group, n=98). After PSM, patients in the TLS group had significantly longer PFS (11.1 versus 5.1 months, P=0.033), OS (not reached versus 14.0 months, P=0.0039) and ORR (modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: 44.0% versus 23.1%; P=0.028) than those in the LS group. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the treatment regimen (TLS versus LS) was an independent predictor for both PFS (HR=0.551; 95% CI: 0.334-0.912; P=0.020) and OS (HR=0.349; 95% CI: 0.176-0.692; P=0.003) and CA19-9 level was an independent predictor for OS (HR=1.005; 95% CI: 1.002-1.008; P=0.000). No significant differences in the incidence of grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported between the two treatment groups. In conclusion, triple combination therapy with TLS improved survival with an acceptable safety profile compared with LS in patients with intermediate or advanced stage HCC.